BCS
Price
$24.42
Change
+$0.13 (+0.54%)
Updated
Sep 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
82.2B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMFG
Price
$25.52
Change
-$0.34 (-1.32%)
Updated
Sep 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
165.22B
55 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCS vs SMFG

BCS vs SMFG Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCS vs. SMFG commentary
Sep 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCS is a Buy and SMFG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCS vs SMFG: Fundamental Ratings
BCS
SMFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7282
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
151
SMR RATING
1..100
41
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4940
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3830
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8590

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCS's Valuation (27) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMFG (79). This means that BCS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMFG’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCS (15). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCS (4). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCS (49). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCS (38). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCSSMFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2026
Stock price -- (BCS: $24.29 vs. SMFG: $25.85)
Brand notoriety: BCS: Notable vs. SMFG: Not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCS: 113% vs. SMFG: 76%
Market capitalization -- BCS: $82.2B vs. SMFG: $165.22B
BCS [@Major Banks] is valued at $82.2B. SMFG’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $165.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $1.04M to $903.78B. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $209.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while SMFG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BCS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SMFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCS is a better buy in the long-term than SMFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMFG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SMFG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCS is a better buy in the short-term than SMFG.

Price Growth

BCS (@Major Banks) experienced а -4.14% price change this week, while SMFG (@Major Banks) price change was -1.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -2.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

SMFG is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-2.85% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

View a ticker or compare two or three
BCS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MUR36.210.83
+2.35%
Murphy Oil Corp
HLT307.22-1.22
-0.40%
Hilton Worldwide Holdings
GSIT5.62-0.23
-4.01%
GSI Technology
CMMB2.28-0.10
-4.20%
Chemomab Therapeutics Ltd
JBIO14.71-2.05
-12.23%
Jade Biosciences Inc

BCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCS has been closely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCS jumps, then ING could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCS
1D Price
Change %
BCS100%
-2.72%
ING - BCS
77%
Closely correlated
-1.35%
HSBC - BCS
77%
Closely correlated
-1.32%
SAN - BCS
76%
Closely correlated
-2.00%
UBS - BCS
70%
Closely correlated
-2.95%
NWG - BCS
69%
Closely correlated
-3.55%
More

SMFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMFG has been closely correlated with MUFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMFG jumps, then MUFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMFG
1D Price
Change %
SMFG100%
-1.11%
MUFG - SMFG
89%
Closely correlated
-1.17%
ING - SMFG
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.35%
BCS - SMFG
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.72%
SAN - SMFG
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.00%
HSBC - SMFG
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.32%
More