Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDFFX vs NRGSX
BDFFX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts BDFFX vs NRGSX
BDFFX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDFFX vs. NRGSX commentary
Sep 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDFFX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 6.91B vs. BDFFX (1.7B). NRGSX pays higher dividends than BDFFX: NRGSX (0.44) vs BDFFX (0.00). BDFFX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: BDFFX (13 years) vs NRGSX (14 years). BDFFX (1.33) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). BDFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NRGSX (23.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDFFX: NRGSX (0) vs BDFFX (2000). BDFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.79 vs. NRGSX (-8.10). BDFFX return over 5 years is better than : -5.86 vs. NRGSX (-23.85).
| BDFFX | NRGSX | BDFFX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.74 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.74 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.799 | 9.583 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.7B | 6.91B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.79 | -8.10 | -22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.21 | 3.84 | 1,282% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.86 | -23.85 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 170.29 | 6.80 | 2,503% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers