Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDHAX vs CIMAX
BDHAX vs CIMAX Comparison
Open Charts BDHAX vs CIMAX
BDHAX vs CIMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDHAX vs. CIMAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDHAX is a Hold and CIMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 147B vs. BDHAX (1.6B). BDHAX pays higher dividends than CIMAX: BDHAX (7.34) vs CIMAX (3.44). BDHAX was incepted earlier than CIMAX: BDHAX (12 years) vs CIMAX (24 years). BDHAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). BDHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 148.00 vs. CIMAX (65.00). BDHAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CIMAX (4%) vs CIMAX (4%). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDHAX: CIMAX (250) vs BDHAX (1000). BDHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.68 vs. CIMAX (7.80). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 26.21 vs. BDHAX (22.56).
| BDHAX | CIMAX | BDHAX / CIMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.59 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.59 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.067 | 5.680 | 72% |
| Front Load | 5% | 4% | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 147B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.34 | 3.44 | 214% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.68 | 7.80 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.08 | 35.58 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.56 | 26.21 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.95 | 82.71 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers