Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDHAX vs CIMCX
BDHAX vs CIMCX Comparison
Open Charts BDHAX vs CIMCX
BDHAX vs CIMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDHAX vs. CIMCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDHAX is a Hold and CIMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 147B vs. BDHAX (1.6B). BDHAX pays higher dividends than CIMCX: BDHAX (7.34) vs CIMCX (2.73). BDHAX was incepted earlier than CIMCX: BDHAX (12 years) vs CIMCX (24 years). CIMCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than BDHAX (1.09). BDHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 148.00 vs. CIMCX (65.00). CIMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDHAX: CIMCX (250) vs BDHAX (1000). BDHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.68 vs. CIMCX (6.97). BDHAX return over 5 years is better than : 22.56 vs. CIMCX (21.45).
| BDHAX | CIMCX | BDHAX / CIMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.35 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.35 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.067 | 5.319 | 76% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 147B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.34 | 2.73 | 269% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.68 | 6.97 | 182% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.08 | 32.51 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.56 | 21.45 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.95 | 69.35 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement