Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDHAX vs CIMCX
BDHAX vs CIMCX Comparison
Open Charts BDHAX vs CIMCX
BDHAX vs CIMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDHAX vs. CIMCX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDHAX is a Buy and CIMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMCX has more cash in the bank: 147B vs. BDHAX (1.6B). BDHAX pays higher dividends than CIMCX: BDHAX (7.34) vs CIMCX (2.73). BDHAX was incepted earlier than CIMCX: BDHAX (12 years) vs CIMCX (24 years). CIMCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than BDHAX (1.09). BDHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 148.00 vs. CIMCX (65.00). CIMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDHAX: CIMCX (250) vs BDHAX (1000). BDHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.42 vs. CIMCX (8.06). BDHAX return over 5 years is better than : 23.39 vs. CIMCX (20.12).
| BDHAX | CIMCX | BDHAX / CIMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.35 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.35 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.874 | 5.654 | 86% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 147B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.34 | 2.73 | 269% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.42 | 8.06 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.16 | 33.07 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.39 | 20.12 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.65 | 67.70 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement