Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDHKX vs CIMAX
BDHKX vs CIMAX Comparison
Open Charts BDHKX vs CIMAX
BDHKX vs CIMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDHKX vs. CIMAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDHKX is a Hold and CIMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 147B vs. BDHKX (1.6B). BDHKX pays higher dividends than CIMAX: BDHKX (7.64) vs CIMAX (3.44). BDHKX was incepted earlier than CIMAX: BDHKX (10 years) vs CIMAX (24 years). BDHKX (0.78) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). BDHKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 148.00 vs. CIMAX (65.00). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDHKX: CIMAX (250) vs BDHKX (5000000). BDHKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.76 vs. CIMAX (7.64). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 25.81 vs. BDHKX (23.11).
| BDHKX | CIMAX | BDHKX / CIMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.59 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.59 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.506 | 5.719 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 147B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.64 | 3.44 | 222% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.76 | 7.64 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.41 | 35.63 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.11 | 25.81 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.39 | 82.77 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement