Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDHKX vs FBAFX
BDHKX vs FBAFX Comparison
Open Charts BDHKX vs FBAFX
BDHKX vs FBAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBAFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. BDHKX (1.6B). BDHKX pays higher dividends than FBAFX: BDHKX (7.64) vs FBAFX (1.99). BDHKX was incepted earlier than FBAFX: BDHKX (10 years) vs FBAFX (6 years). BDHKX (0.78) is less costly to investors than FBAFX (0.33). BDHKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 148.00 vs. FBAFX (50.00). FBAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDHKX: FBAFX (250) vs BDHKX (5000000). FBAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.15 vs. BDHKX (11.76). FBAFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.61 vs. BDHKX (23.11).
| BDHKX | FBAFX | BDHKX / FBAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.33 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.33 | 236% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.506 | 8.380 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 288B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.64 | 1.99 | 384% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.76 | 15.15 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.41 | 43.95 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.11 | 37.61 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement