Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDMAX vs JMNAX
BDMAX vs JMNAX Comparison
Open Charts BDMAX vs JMNAX
BDMAX vs JMNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDMAX vs. JMNAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDMAX is a Hold and JMNAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BDMAX has more cash in the bank: 15.6B vs. JMNAX (331M). BDMAX pays higher dividends than JMNAX: BDMAX (8.81) vs JMNAX (2.91). BDMAX was incepted earlier than JMNAX: BDMAX (14 years) vs JMNAX (25 years). JMNAX (2.87) is less costly to investors than BDMAX (1.64). JMNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. BDMAX (113.00). BDMAX (5%) and JMNAX (5%) have equivalent initial investment costs. BDMAX (1000) and JMNAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. BDMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.59 vs. JMNAX (-3.68). BDMAX return over 5 years is better than : 87.67 vs. JMNAX (26.15).
| BDMAX | JMNAX | BDMAX / JMNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 2.62 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 2.87 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.824 | -3.434 | -432% |
| Front Load | 5% | 5% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.6B | 331M | 4,713% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.81 | 2.91 | 302% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.59 | -3.68 | -451% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.44 | 14.82 | 489% |
| Returns for 5 years | 87.67 | 26.15 | 335% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.79 | 11.13 | 960% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers