Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDMCX vs QMNNX
BDMCX vs QMNNX Comparison
Open Charts BDMCX vs QMNNX
BDMCX vs QMNNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDMCX vs. QMNNX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDMCX is a Hold and QMNNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BDMCX has more cash in the bank: 12.8B vs. QMNNX (2.95B). BDMCX pays higher dividends than QMNNX: BDMCX (6.33) vs QMNNX (1.34). BDMCX was incepted earlier than QMNNX: BDMCX (13 years) vs QMNNX (12 years). QMNNX (6.31) is less costly to investors than BDMCX (2.37). QMNNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 338.00 vs. BDMCX (44.00). BDMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QMNNX: BDMCX (1000) vs QMNNX (2500). BDMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.06 vs. QMNNX (3.33). QMNNX return over 5 years is better than : 115.12 vs. BDMCX (68.61).
| BDMCX | QMNNX | BDMCX / QMNNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 6.31 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.37 | 6.31 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.018 | -5.984 | -201% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.8B | 2.95B | 434% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.33 | 1.34 | 471% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.06 | 3.33 | 542% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.80 | 71.07 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.61 | 115.12 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.17 | 44.23 | 188% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement