Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDMCX vs QMNRX
BDMCX vs QMNRX Comparison
Open Charts BDMCX vs QMNRX
BDMCX vs QMNRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDMCX vs. QMNRX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDMCX is a Hold and QMNRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BDMCX has more cash in the bank: 13.5B vs. QMNRX (2.97B). BDMCX pays higher dividends than QMNRX: BDMCX (6.33) vs QMNRX (1.56). BDMCX was incepted earlier than QMNRX: BDMCX (14 years) vs QMNRX (12 years). QMNRX (5.91) is less costly to investors than BDMCX (2.37). QMNRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 338.00 vs. BDMCX (44.00). BDMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QMNRX: BDMCX (1000) vs QMNRX (50000000). BDMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.72 vs. QMNRX (4.21). QMNRX return over 5 years is better than : 134.67 vs. BDMCX (69.72).
| BDMCX | QMNRX | BDMCX / QMNRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 5.91 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.37 | 5.91 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.558 | -6.285 | -200% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 50000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.5B | 2.97B | 454% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.33 | 1.56 | 405% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.72 | 4.21 | 468% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.83 | 66.70 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.72 | 134.67 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.21 | 49.36 | 179% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers