BDX
Price
$156.36
Change
+$3.39 (+2.22%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
43.08B
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CNMD
Price
$42.68
Change
+$1.41 (+3.42%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.29B
4 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BDX vs CNMD

BDX vs CNMD Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 20, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Becton Dickinson (BDX) vs. CONMED (CNMD) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Becton Dickinson (BDX) is a large-cap medical technology giant with a market capitalization of approximately $43.6 billion, while CONMED (CNMD) is a smaller, mid-cap competitor valued at roughly $1.3 billion.
  • BDX has delivered a one-year total return of approximately 14%, driven by consistent earnings beats and a strategic transformation into a pure-play MedTech company following the separation of its Biosciences and Diagnostic Solutions business.
  • CNMD has staged a sharp recovery in recent weeks — gaining more than 30% in the past month — but remains down roughly 12% over the trailing one-year period amid mixed analyst sentiment and earnings headwinds.
  • BDX offers investors a 2.7% annual dividend yield with relatively low volatility (beta of 0.21), whereas CNMD carries a 1.85% yield and higher volatility (beta of 0.93).
  • Wall Street consensus rates both stocks as a "Hold" on average, though BDX's average price target sits well above its current trading price, while CNMD's target suggests limited upside from recent levels.
  • Tickeron's AI-driven analysis suggests BDX may currently hold an edge based on trend consistency, earnings momentum, and institutional positioning.

Introduction

Investors navigating the medical technology sector often find themselves weighing large, diversified incumbents against smaller, more specialized device makers. This comparison between BDX (Becton, Dickinson and Company) and CNMD (CONMED Corporation) captures that dynamic. Both companies operate in the healthcare device space, yet they differ significantly in scale, business mix, growth trajectory, and market positioning. For traders evaluating relative performance, risk-adjusted returns, or sector exposure, understanding how these two stocks compare can help frame a broader investment thesis. This article examines each company's recent performance, key developments, and competitive profile to provide a balanced, data-driven stock comparison.

BDX Overview and Recent Performance

Becton, Dickinson and Company is one of the world's largest pure-play medical technology firms, employing more than 60,000 people globally. Its product portfolio spans medical essentials, connected care, biopharma systems, and interventional devices — including syringes, infusion therapy systems, pharmacy automation solutions, and surgical instruments. In recent quarters, BDX has undergone a significant strategic transformation, completing the separation of its Biosciences and Diagnostic Solutions business through a combination with Waters Corporation, pivoting the company to a focused MedTech structure under its "New BD" framework.

On the financial front, BDX reported fiscal second-quarter 2026 revenue of $4.71 billion, representing 5.2% reported growth year-over-year, with adjusted diluted EPS (Earnings Per Share) of $2.90 — beating consensus estimates. The company also executed a $2.0 billion accelerated share repurchase (ASR) program and retired $2.1 billion in debt, signaling confidence in its balance sheet. Management raised full-year adjusted EPS guidance to a range of $12.52 to $12.72. In recent trading activity, BDX shares have been moving near the $154 level, with the stock finding support after bouncing from its 52-week low. Institutional investors continue to hold approximately 87% of outstanding shares, reflecting entrenched professional ownership. The stock also pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share, translating to an annualized yield of roughly 2.7%.

CNMD Overview and Recent Performance

CONMED Corporation, headquartered in Utica, New York, is a global medical technology company specializing in surgical devices and accessories for minimally invasive procedures. Founded in 1970, the company operates across two primary segments: Orthopedics and Visualization & Energy. Its products support surgeons in specialties such as general surgery, gastroenterology, gynecology, and orthopedic procedures. With a market capitalization of approximately $1.3 billion, CNMD is a fraction of BDX's size, making it a more targeted play within the surgical device subsector.

CNMD's recent financial performance has been mixed. In its most recently reported quarter, the company posted earnings per share of $0.89, topping consensus estimates of $0.82, on revenue of approximately $317 million — down about 1.3% year-over-year. Full-year 2025 revenue reached $1.37 billion, reflecting 5.5% annual growth, though the company's diluted EPS contracted sharply from $4.25 in 2024 to $1.51. The stock experienced notable volatility in recent weeks, with a dramatic rebound of more than 30% in the past month, lifting shares from near their 52-week low of $31.44 back into the low-$40s. Analyst sentiment remains cautious: of seven analysts covering the stock, six rate it as "Hold" and one as "Sell," with an average price target of roughly $39, suggesting limited upside. CNMD also pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share, yielding approximately 1.85%.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking an algorithmic edge in evaluating stocks like BDX and CNMD, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to navigate evolving market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only the most effective and market-aligned bots earn a spot in the Trending AI Robots section. These bots vary widely in trading style — from swing trading and trend following to mean-reversion and breakout strategies — and operate across different timeframes, risk profiles, and performance metrics. Some bots have demonstrated annualized returns exceeding 40%, while others focus on capital preservation with lower drawdowns. Each bot provides transparent historical performance statistics, including win rates, average trade duration, and maximum drawdown figures, allowing users to match strategies to their own goals. Explore the Trending AI Robots to discover which automated strategies currently align with your market outlook.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When comparing BDX and CNMD, the most obvious contrast is scale. BDX's $43.6 billion market cap and diversified revenue base provide a level of operating resilience that CNMD — with its $1.3 billion valuation and narrower surgical-device focus — cannot easily replicate. BDX generates more than $20 billion in annual revenue across multiple healthcare verticals, whereas CNMD operates at roughly $1.4 billion in annual sales concentrated in orthopedics and surgical visualization.

In terms of risk profile, BDX trades with a strikingly low beta of 0.21, indicating that its price movements are far less correlated with broader market swings. CNMD's beta of 0.93, by contrast, suggests near-market-level volatility. This makes BDX potentially more suitable for risk-averse investors, while CNMD may appeal to those willing to accept greater price swings in pursuit of outsized gains — as evidenced by its dramatic 30%+ surge in recent weeks.

Growth dynamics also diverge. BDX is in the midst of a deliberate post-separation repositioning, focusing on margin expansion, disciplined capital allocation, and innovation in high-growth platforms such as biologic drug delivery and advanced patient monitoring. CNMD, meanwhile, is navigating a more challenging earnings trajectory — trailing twelve-month EPS of $1.77 represents a sharp decline from prior-year levels — and faces a more uncertain near-term outlook, with consensus estimates forecasting slight revenue contraction in 2026.

Dividend investors will note that BDX offers a higher yield at 2.7% versus CNMD's 1.85%, though BDX's payout ratio exceeds 100%, warranting monitoring. On valuation, BDX trades at approximately 40 times trailing earnings compared to CNMD's roughly 24 times, reflecting a premium the market assigns to BDX's scale, diversification, and stability.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including trend consistency, earnings momentum, institutional positioning, and relative risk-adjusted stability, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis currently appears to favor Becton Dickinson (BDX) over CONMED (CNMD). BDX's combination of consistent earnings beats, a raised full-year guidance, aggressive capital return initiatives, and extremely low beta suggests a steadier and more predictable trend profile — characteristics that AI models tend to identify as favorable in a comparative framework. While CNMD's recent price surge reflects genuine momentum and potential turnaround sentiment, the company's negative one-year return, cautious analyst consensus, and higher volatility introduce greater statistical uncertainty. In probabilistic terms, BDX's broader support from institutional flows and its diversified revenue base provide a more stable foundation. That said, traders with shorter time horizons and higher risk tolerance may still find CNMD's volatility-driven opportunities compelling under certain market regimes.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BDX vs. CNMD commentary
Jul 26, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDX is a StrongBuy and CNMD is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2026
Stock price -- (BDX: $156.36 vs. CNMD: $42.68)
Brand notoriety: BDX and CNMD are both not notable
BDX represents the Pharmaceuticals: Other, while CNMD is part of the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BDX: 46% vs. CNMD: 65%
Market capitalization -- BDX: $43.08B vs. CNMD: $1.29B
BDX [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $43.08B. CNMD’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $1.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $119.23B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $179.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $7.43B. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BDX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCNMD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BDX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CNMD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNMD is a better buy in the long-term than BDX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BDX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNMD’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BDX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CNMD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNMD is a better buy in the short-term than BDX.

Price Growth

BDX (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -1.14% price change this week, while CNMD (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -1.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -3.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.46%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -5.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was -21.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

BDX is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

CNMD is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-3.53% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

@Medical/Nursing Services (-5.78% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BDX($43.1B) has a higher market cap than CNMD($1.29B). BDX has higher P/E ratio than CNMD: BDX (27.29) vs CNMD (24.11). CNMD YTD gains are higher at: 5.123 vs. BDX (3.834). BDX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.97B vs. CNMD (187M). CNMD has less debt than BDX: CNMD (861M) vs BDX (17.3B). BDX has higher revenues than CNMD: BDX (22.2B) vs CNMD (1.37B).
BDXCNMDBDX / CNMD
Capitalization43.1B1.29B3,354%
EBITDA4.97B187M2,657%
Gain YTD3.8345.12375%
P/E Ratio27.2924.11113%
Revenue22.2B1.37B1,619%
Total CashN/A35M-
Total Debt17.3B861M2,009%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BDX vs CNMD: Fundamental Ratings
BDX
CNMD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7919
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8785
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4944
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7613
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BDX's Valuation (7) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as CNMD (9). This means that BDX’s stock grew similarly to CNMD’s over the last 12 months.

BDX's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as CNMD (100). This means that BDX’s stock grew similarly to CNMD’s over the last 12 months.

CNMD's SMR Rating (85) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as BDX (87). This means that CNMD’s stock grew similarly to BDX’s over the last 12 months.

CNMD's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as BDX (49). This means that CNMD’s stock grew similarly to BDX’s over the last 12 months.

CNMD's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BDX (76). This means that CNMD’s stock grew somewhat faster than BDX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BDXCNMD
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BDX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CNMD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PHSZX51.07N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Health Sciences Z
DHTAX25.67N/A
N/A
Diamond Hill Select Inv
HNDDX83.25N/A
N/A
Horizon Equity Premium Income Investor
CGTUX139.10N/A
N/A
Columbia Global Technology Growth Inst3
CGFEX80.10-0.68
-0.84%
American Funds Growth Fd of Amer 529-E

BDX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BDX has been loosely correlated with COO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BDX jumps, then COO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BDX
1D Price
Change %
BDX100%
+2.22%
COO - BDX
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
TMO - BDX
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
BAX - BDX
49%
Loosely correlated
+3.37%
CNMD - BDX
48%
Loosely correlated
+3.42%
MMSI - BDX
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.66%
More

CNMD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNMD has been loosely correlated with ENOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNMD jumps, then ENOV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNMD
1D Price
Change %
CNMD100%
+3.42%
ENOV - CNMD
58%
Loosely correlated
+3.72%
KIDS - CNMD
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.80%
IART - CNMD
52%
Loosely correlated
+6.63%
NVST - CNMD
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
SYK - CNMD
49%
Loosely correlated
+3.54%
More