Investors navigating the medical technology sector often find themselves weighing large, diversified incumbents against smaller, more specialized device makers. This comparison between BDX (Becton, Dickinson and Company) and CNMD (CONMED Corporation) captures that dynamic. Both companies operate in the healthcare device space, yet they differ significantly in scale, business mix, growth trajectory, and market positioning. For traders evaluating relative performance, risk-adjusted returns, or sector exposure, understanding how these two stocks compare can help frame a broader investment thesis. This article examines each company's recent performance, key developments, and competitive profile to provide a balanced, data-driven stock comparison.
Becton, Dickinson and Company is one of the world's largest pure-play medical technology firms, employing more than 60,000 people globally. Its product portfolio spans medical essentials, connected care, biopharma systems, and interventional devices — including syringes, infusion therapy systems, pharmacy automation solutions, and surgical instruments. In recent quarters, BDX has undergone a significant strategic transformation, completing the separation of its Biosciences and Diagnostic Solutions business through a combination with Waters Corporation, pivoting the company to a focused MedTech structure under its "New BD" framework.
On the financial front, BDX reported fiscal second-quarter 2026 revenue of $4.71 billion, representing 5.2% reported growth year-over-year, with adjusted diluted EPS (Earnings Per Share) of $2.90 — beating consensus estimates. The company also executed a $2.0 billion accelerated share repurchase (ASR) program and retired $2.1 billion in debt, signaling confidence in its balance sheet. Management raised full-year adjusted EPS guidance to a range of $12.52 to $12.72. In recent trading activity, BDX shares have been moving near the $154 level, with the stock finding support after bouncing from its 52-week low. Institutional investors continue to hold approximately 87% of outstanding shares, reflecting entrenched professional ownership. The stock also pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share, translating to an annualized yield of roughly 2.7%.
CONMED Corporation, headquartered in Utica, New York, is a global medical technology company specializing in surgical devices and accessories for minimally invasive procedures. Founded in 1970, the company operates across two primary segments: Orthopedics and Visualization & Energy. Its products support surgeons in specialties such as general surgery, gastroenterology, gynecology, and orthopedic procedures. With a market capitalization of approximately $1.3 billion, CNMD is a fraction of BDX's size, making it a more targeted play within the surgical device subsector.
CNMD's recent financial performance has been mixed. In its most recently reported quarter, the company posted earnings per share of $0.89, topping consensus estimates of $0.82, on revenue of approximately $317 million — down about 1.3% year-over-year. Full-year 2025 revenue reached $1.37 billion, reflecting 5.5% annual growth, though the company's diluted EPS contracted sharply from $4.25 in 2024 to $1.51. The stock experienced notable volatility in recent weeks, with a dramatic rebound of more than 30% in the past month, lifting shares from near their 52-week low of $31.44 back into the low-$40s. Analyst sentiment remains cautious: of seven analysts covering the stock, six rate it as "Hold" and one as "Sell," with an average price target of roughly $39, suggesting limited upside. CNMD also pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share, yielding approximately 1.85%.
For traders seeking an algorithmic edge in evaluating stocks like BDX and CNMD, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to navigate evolving market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only the most effective and market-aligned bots earn a spot in the Trending AI Robots section. These bots vary widely in trading style — from swing trading and trend following to mean-reversion and breakout strategies — and operate across different timeframes, risk profiles, and performance metrics. Some bots have demonstrated annualized returns exceeding 40%, while others focus on capital preservation with lower drawdowns. Each bot provides transparent historical performance statistics, including win rates, average trade duration, and maximum drawdown figures, allowing users to match strategies to their own goals. Explore the Trending AI Robots to discover which automated strategies currently align with your market outlook.
When comparing BDX and CNMD, the most obvious contrast is scale. BDX's $43.6 billion market cap and diversified revenue base provide a level of operating resilience that CNMD — with its $1.3 billion valuation and narrower surgical-device focus — cannot easily replicate. BDX generates more than $20 billion in annual revenue across multiple healthcare verticals, whereas CNMD operates at roughly $1.4 billion in annual sales concentrated in orthopedics and surgical visualization.
In terms of risk profile, BDX trades with a strikingly low beta of 0.21, indicating that its price movements are far less correlated with broader market swings. CNMD's beta of 0.93, by contrast, suggests near-market-level volatility. This makes BDX potentially more suitable for risk-averse investors, while CNMD may appeal to those willing to accept greater price swings in pursuit of outsized gains — as evidenced by its dramatic 30%+ surge in recent weeks.
Growth dynamics also diverge. BDX is in the midst of a deliberate post-separation repositioning, focusing on margin expansion, disciplined capital allocation, and innovation in high-growth platforms such as biologic drug delivery and advanced patient monitoring. CNMD, meanwhile, is navigating a more challenging earnings trajectory — trailing twelve-month EPS of $1.77 represents a sharp decline from prior-year levels — and faces a more uncertain near-term outlook, with consensus estimates forecasting slight revenue contraction in 2026.
Dividend investors will note that BDX offers a higher yield at 2.7% versus CNMD's 1.85%, though BDX's payout ratio exceeds 100%, warranting monitoring. On valuation, BDX trades at approximately 40 times trailing earnings compared to CNMD's roughly 24 times, reflecting a premium the market assigns to BDX's scale, diversification, and stability.
Based on observable factors including trend consistency, earnings momentum, institutional positioning, and relative risk-adjusted stability, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis currently appears to favor Becton Dickinson (BDX) over CONMED (CNMD). BDX's combination of consistent earnings beats, a raised full-year guidance, aggressive capital return initiatives, and extremely low beta suggests a steadier and more predictable trend profile — characteristics that AI models tend to identify as favorable in a comparative framework. While CNMD's recent price surge reflects genuine momentum and potential turnaround sentiment, the company's negative one-year return, cautious analyst consensus, and higher volatility introduce greater statistical uncertainty. In probabilistic terms, BDX's broader support from institutional flows and its diversified revenue base provide a more stable foundation. That said, traders with shorter time horizons and higher risk tolerance may still find CNMD's volatility-driven opportunities compelling under certain market regimes.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BDX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCNMD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BDX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNMD’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
BDX (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -1.14% price change this week, while CNMD (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -1.20% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -3.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.46%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -5.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was -21.89%.
BDX is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
CNMD is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
@Medical/Nursing Services (-5.78% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| BDX | CNMD | BDX / CNMD | |
| Capitalization | 43.1B | 1.29B | 3,354% |
| EBITDA | 4.97B | 187M | 2,657% |
| Gain YTD | 3.834 | 5.123 | 75% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.29 | 24.11 | 113% |
| Revenue | 22.2B | 1.37B | 1,619% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 35M | - |
| Total Debt | 17.3B | 861M | 2,009% |
BDX | CNMD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 7 Undervalued | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BDX's Valuation (7) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as CNMD (9). This means that BDX’s stock grew similarly to CNMD’s over the last 12 months.
BDX's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as CNMD (100). This means that BDX’s stock grew similarly to CNMD’s over the last 12 months.
CNMD's SMR Rating (85) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as BDX (87). This means that CNMD’s stock grew similarly to BDX’s over the last 12 months.
CNMD's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as BDX (49). This means that CNMD’s stock grew similarly to BDX’s over the last 12 months.
CNMD's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BDX (76). This means that CNMD’s stock grew somewhat faster than BDX’s over the last 12 months.
| BDX | CNMD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 43% | 10 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 43% | 18 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 60% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PHSZX | 51.07 | N/A | N/A |
| PGIM Jennison Health Sciences Z | |||
| DHTAX | 25.67 | N/A | N/A |
| Diamond Hill Select Inv | |||
| HNDDX | 83.25 | N/A | N/A |
| Horizon Equity Premium Income Investor | |||
| CGTUX | 139.10 | N/A | N/A |
| Columbia Global Technology Growth Inst3 | |||
| CGFEX | 80.10 | -0.68 | -0.84% |
| American Funds Growth Fd of Amer 529-E | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BDX has been loosely correlated with COO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BDX jumps, then COO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BDX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BDX | 100% | +2.22% | ||
| COO - BDX | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| TMO - BDX | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| BAX - BDX | 49% Loosely correlated | +3.37% | ||
| CNMD - BDX | 48% Loosely correlated | +3.42% | ||
| MMSI - BDX | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.66% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNMD has been loosely correlated with ENOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNMD jumps, then ENOV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CNMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNMD | 100% | +3.42% | ||
| ENOV - CNMD | 58% Loosely correlated | +3.72% | ||
| KIDS - CNMD | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| IART - CNMD | 52% Loosely correlated | +6.63% | ||
| NVST - CNMD | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| SYK - CNMD | 49% Loosely correlated | +3.54% | ||
More | ||||