This stock comparison examines BDX and CNMD, two players in the medical technology sector focused on devices and supplies. Investors seeking exposure to healthcare innovation, particularly in surgical and diagnostic tools, may find value in analyzing their relative performance. Traders monitoring relative strength in a volatile market environment can use this head-to-head to gauge momentum, valuation trade-offs, and sector positioning. With both stocks navigating recent earnings cycles and macroeconomic pressures, understanding their contrasts aids informed decision-making in portfolio allocation or short-term trades.
Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) is a global leader in developing, manufacturing, and selling medical devices, laboratory equipment, and diagnostic products across segments like Medical Essentials, Connected Care, and Life Sciences. In recent market activity, shares have traded near the lower end of their 52-week range of $127.59 to $187.35, reflecting broader sector caution following mixed quarterly results. Q1 fiscal 2026 revenue reached $5.25 billion with net income of $831.81 million, though analysts anticipate Q2 declines in earnings per share (EPS, a measure of profitability per share) and revenue amid supply chain headwinds and softer demand. Positive sentiment drivers include product innovations in vascular access and employee well-being recognitions, alongside a steady dividend declaration, supporting resilience in a challenging environment.
CONMED Corporation (CNMD) specializes in surgical devices and equipment for minimally invasive procedures, targeting orthopedics, general surgery, and other specialties. In recent weeks, the stock has experienced downward pressure, underperforming broader indices with YTD declines around 5.92% and heightened volatility. Shares hover near recent lows amid a 52-week range reflecting sharp drops. Q4 CY2025 results exceeded revenue expectations with 7.9% year-over-year growth, yet subsequent quarters highlighted slowing demand and valuation concerns. Factors influencing sentiment include analyst price target reductions and comparisons to peers, tempered by projections for 5.2% long-term earnings growth. Recent trading shows weekly declines, underscoring sensitivity to market rotations away from smaller-cap medtech names.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates 25 top-performing AI trading bots from over 351 available, each scanning thousands of tickers for real-time signals suited to current market conditions like AI infrastructure booms, volatility plays, and sector rotations. These bots employ diverse strategies—ranging from short-term scalping (5-60 minutes) to swing trades—delivering impressive stats such as annualized returns of +30% to +163%, win rates of 50-88%, profit factors from 1.5 to 7+, and profit-to-drawdown ratios up to 17. Focused on high-momentum areas like semiconductors, data centers, and small caps, they have outperformed the S&P 500 in recent months. Explore these bots to align automated trading with prevailing trends across various timeframes and risk profiles.
BDX and CNMD both serve the medtech space but differ in scale and focus: BDX’s diversified portfolio spans diagnostics and infusion systems for broad healthcare exposure, while CNMD emphasizes niche surgical tools with higher growth potential but execution risks. Valuation metrics highlight BDX’s trailing price-to-earnings (P/E, stock price relative to EPS) ratio of 24.4 versus CNMD’s 20.8, though CNMD trades at a lower price-to-sales multiple of 0.83. Recent momentum favors neither strongly, with both facing YTD softness, but BDX’s lower beta signals reduced risk amid market swings. Growth drivers for BDX include innovation pipelines, while CNMD contends with demand slowdowns; sentiment tilts toward BDX’s return on equity (ROE, profitability relative to shareholders' equity) of 6.96% over CNMD’s 5.50%.
Tickeron’s AI analysis leans toward BDX in the current environment, citing its superior scale, higher margins, lower volatility, and trend stability relative to CNMD. Factors like consistent revenue execution and defensive beta position BDX favorably amid sector headwinds, though CNMD could rebound on earnings beats. This probabilistic edge reflects observable momentum and risk-reward dynamics rather than guarantees.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BDX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCNMD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BDX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNMD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BDX (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +2.32% price change this week, while CNMD (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -1.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.09%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +0.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.00%.
BDX is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
CNMD is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
@Medical/Nursing Services (+0.99% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| BDX | CNMD | BDX / CNMD | |
| Capitalization | 40.6B | 1.08B | 3,749% |
| EBITDA | 4.97B | 187M | 2,657% |
| Gain YTD | -2.729 | -11.404 | 24% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.74 | 20.32 | 127% |
| Revenue | 22.2B | 1.37B | 1,619% |
| Total Cash | 816M | 35M | 2,331% |
| Total Debt | 17.3B | 861M | 2,009% |
BDX | CNMD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 86 | 84 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 82 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 26 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BDX's Valuation (15) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as CNMD (17). This means that BDX’s stock grew similarly to CNMD’s over the last 12 months.
BDX's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as CNMD (100). This means that BDX’s stock grew similarly to CNMD’s over the last 12 months.
CNMD's SMR Rating (84) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as BDX (86). This means that CNMD’s stock grew similarly to BDX’s over the last 12 months.
BDX's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as CNMD (82). This means that BDX’s stock grew similarly to CNMD’s over the last 12 months.
CNMD's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BDX (77). This means that CNMD’s stock grew somewhat faster than BDX’s over the last 12 months.
| BDX | CNMD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 41% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 42% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 43% | 6 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 56% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DFLV | 38.24 | 0.10 | +0.26% |
| Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF | |||
| LQDH | 93.00 | -0.03 | -0.03% |
| iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corp Bd ETF | |||
| TINT | 41.01 | -0.29 | -0.71% |
| ProShares Smart Materials ETF | |||
| DBEM | 39.22 | -1.15 | -2.85% |
| Xtrackers MSCI Em Mkts Hdg Eq ETF | |||
| LABX | 47.02 | -1.68 | -3.45% |
| Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BDX has been loosely correlated with TMO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BDX jumps, then TMO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BDX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BDX | 100% | +3.05% | ||
| TMO - BDX | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.48% | ||
| COO - BDX | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.64% | ||
| CNMD - BDX | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.10% | ||
| BAX - BDX | 47% Loosely correlated | +2.05% | ||
| SOLV - BDX | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.32% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNMD has been loosely correlated with IART. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNMD jumps, then IART could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CNMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNMD | 100% | +2.10% | ||
| IART - CNMD | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| ENOV - CNMD | 58% Loosely correlated | +4.88% | ||
| KIDS - CNMD | 54% Loosely correlated | +3.26% | ||
| NVST - CNMD | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| VREX - CNMD | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.70% | ||
More | ||||