BE
Price
$205.81
Change
-$1.31 (-0.63%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
60.62B
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RUN
Price
$9.81
Change
+$0.29 (+3.05%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
2.34B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BE vs RUN

BE vs RUN Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) vs. Sunrun Inc. (RUN) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) focuses on solid oxide fuel cell systems for on-site power generation, while Sunrun Inc. (RUN) specializes in residential solar energy systems.
  • BE has shown strong year-to-date momentum with substantial gains in the first half of 2026, though recent market activity has introduced volatility ahead of its July 28 earnings report.
  • RUN has experienced notable declines over recent weeks and months amid sector pressures in residential solar, with ongoing volatility in its share price.
  • Both companies operate in the clean energy sector but differ in business models: BE emphasizes stationary fuel cell technology, while RUN centers on distributed solar installations and ownership.
  • Sector exposure for both includes renewable energy tailwinds, yet RUN faces additional sensitivity to financing conditions and policy dynamics affecting residential adoption.
  • Market sentiment reflects BE's growth trajectory contrasted with RUN's more challenged positioning in recent trading sessions.

Introduction

This comparison examines Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and Sunrun Inc. (RUN), two companies in the clean energy space that appeal to investors seeking exposure to renewable technologies and energy transition themes. BE develops and deploys fuel cell systems, while RUN provides residential solar solutions. Traders and investors monitoring relative performance, sector rotation within renewables, or shifts in market positioning may find this analysis relevant for understanding how these stocks have behaved amid broader economic and industry conditions. The focus remains on observable factors such as business models, recent price behavior, and key contrasts.

BE Overview and Recent Performance

Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) designs, manufactures, and installs solid oxide fuel cell systems for on-site power generation, serving commercial, industrial, and utility customers in the United States and internationally. In recent market activity, the stock demonstrated notable strength earlier in 2026 before encountering increased volatility. Recent weeks have featured sharp price movements, including a significant decline on July 24, amid anticipation of the company's second-quarter earnings release scheduled for July 28. Factors influencing sentiment include the firm's expanding contracted backlog and growth in the renewable energy sector, balanced against broader market fluctuations affecting high-growth clean energy names.

RUN Overview and Recent Performance

Sunrun Inc. (RUN) designs, develops, installs, sells, owns, and maintains residential solar energy systems across the United States. The company has operated in a challenging environment in recent weeks and months, with its share price reflecting downward pressure amid sector-wide dynamics in residential solar. Recent trading sessions have shown continued volatility, consistent with patterns observed over broader timeframes. Influences on performance include sensitivity to financing conditions, customer acquisition trends, and macroeconomic factors impacting distributed energy adoption, resulting in a more subdued relative trajectory compared to earlier periods.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section. Available bots span a wide range of statistics, including different win rates, drawdown profiles, and return characteristics tailored to diverse trading approaches. This resource provides traders with data-driven options for automated strategies across multiple assets and market environments.

Head-to-Head Comparison

In business model terms, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) emphasizes stationary fuel cell technology for reliable on-site generation, offering differentiation from Sunrun Inc. (RUN)’s focus on customer-owned or leased residential solar installations. Growth drivers for BE include expansion in contracted backlog and fuel cell adoption, while RUN’s trajectory ties more closely to residential demand, net metering policies, and financing availability. Recent momentum has favored BE’s earlier gains in 2026, contrasted with RUN’s more pronounced pullback over recent weeks. Risk factors differ as well: BE contends with execution on large-scale deployments and earnings variability, whereas RUN faces heightened exposure to interest rate sensitivity and solar-specific policy shifts. Sector exposure overlaps in renewables but highlights trade-offs between centralized fuel cell solutions and distributed solar assets. Market sentiment appears more constructive toward BE’s positioning amid growth indicators, while RUN reflects caution in current trading.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, stability metrics, and relative positioning in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to Bloom Energy Corporation (BE). This assessment draws from BE’s stronger momentum trajectory and upcoming catalysts versus RUN’s more pressured recent performance profile. The view remains probabilistic and subject to new data, including earnings outcomes and broader sector developments.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BE vs. RUN commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BE is a Hold and RUN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (BE: $205.81 vs. RUN: $9.81)
Brand notoriety: BE: Notable vs. RUN: Not notable
BE represents the Electrical Products, while RUN is part of the Alternative Power Generation industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BE: 145% vs. RUN: 51%
Market capitalization -- BE: $60.62B vs. RUN: $2.34B
BE [@Electrical Products] is valued at $60.62B. RUN’s [@Alternative Power Generation] market capitalization is $2.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electrical Products] industry ranges from $300.34B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Alternative Power Generation] industry ranges from $118.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electrical Products] industry is $5.32B. The average market capitalization across the [@Alternative Power Generation] industry is $2.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRUN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RUN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BE is a better buy in the long-term than RUN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BE’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RUN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RUN is a better buy in the short-term than BE.

Price Growth

BE (@Electrical Products) experienced а +11.31% price change this week, while RUN (@Alternative Power Generation) price change was -1.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was -3.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -21.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was -17.31%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Alternative Power Generation industry was +3.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

BE is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

RUN is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electrical Products (-3.07% weekly)

The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.

@Alternative Power Generation (+3.14% weekly)

The alternative power generation industry consists of companies that operate power facilities converting non-conventional forms of energy into electricity. These energy forms are alternatives to fossil fuels, and many of them are derived from natural resources. Alternative energy forms include solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal steam. A major purpose behind using alternative energy – also called ‘clean’ energy - is to address concerns related to the more conventional fossil fuels, such as the latter’s high carbon dioxide emissions which is often considered a factor in global warming. Alternative power generation has been gaining traction in recent years, and could grow further in the future. Large organizations like Google have invested substantially in wind and solar energy-powered electricity. Some of the prominent U.S. companies operating in the alternative power generation industry includes Ormat Technologies, Inc., TerraForm Power, Inc. and NextEra Energy Partners LP.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BE($60.6B) has a higher market cap than RUN($2.34B). BE has higher P/E ratio than RUN: BE (267.29) vs RUN (4.61). BE YTD gains are higher at: 136.863 vs. RUN (-46.685). RUN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 700M vs. BE (113M). BE has more cash in the bank: 2.49B vs. RUN (680M). BE has less debt than RUN: BE (2.95B) vs RUN (14.9B). RUN has higher revenues than BE: RUN (3.18B) vs BE (2.45B).
BERUNBE / RUN
Capitalization60.6B2.34B2,590%
EBITDA113M700M16%
Gain YTD136.863-46.685-293%
P/E Ratio267.294.615,803%
Revenue2.45B3.18B77%
Total Cash2.49B680M366%
Total Debt2.95B14.9B20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BE vs RUN: Fundamental Ratings
BE
RUN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5250
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
48100
SMR RATING
1..100
9147
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3583
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10086
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5034

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RUN's Valuation (87) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as BE (100). This means that RUN’s stock grew similarly to BE’s over the last 12 months.

BE's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RUN (100). This means that BE’s stock grew somewhat faster than RUN’s over the last 12 months.

RUN's SMR Rating (47) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BE (91). This means that RUN’s stock grew somewhat faster than BE’s over the last 12 months.

BE's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RUN (83). This means that BE’s stock grew somewhat faster than RUN’s over the last 12 months.

RUN's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as BE (100). This means that RUN’s stock grew similarly to BE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BERUN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RUN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LEDS2.130.18
+9.23%
SemiLEDS Corp
NOC542.487.63
+1.43%
Northrop Grumman Corp
UTMD70.520.95
+1.37%
Utah Medical Products
VOR21.15-0.65
-2.98%
Vor Biopharma Inc
SSRM25.62-1.06
-3.97%
SSR Mining

BE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BE has been loosely correlated with RUN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BE jumps, then RUN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BE
1D Price
Change %
BE100%
-0.63%
RUN - BE
62%
Loosely correlated
+3.05%
VRT - BE
57%
Loosely correlated
+6.18%
FSLR - BE
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.44%
ENPH - BE
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
NVT - BE
52%
Loosely correlated
+6.24%
More