Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEGRX vs FMDRX
BEGRX vs FMDRX Comparison
Open Charts BEGRX vs FMDRX
BEGRX vs FMDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEGRX vs. FMDRX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEGRX is a Hold and FMDRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMDRX has more cash in the bank: 8.98B vs. BEGRX (3.41B). FMDRX pays higher dividends than BEGRX: FMDRX (1.82) vs BEGRX (1.34). BEGRX was incepted earlier than FMDRX: BEGRX (64 years) vs FMDRX (13 years). FMDRX (0.89) is less costly to investors than BEGRX (0.76). BEGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.86 vs. FMDRX (42.28). BEGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMDRX: BEGRX (100000) vs FMDRX (1000000). BEGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.59 vs. FMDRX (2.64). BEGRX return over 5 years is better than : 5.36 vs. FMDRX (4.32).
| BEGRX | FMDRX | BEGRX / FMDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.89 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.89 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 64 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.129 | 0.437 | 259% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000000 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.41B | 8.98B | 38% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.82 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.59 | 2.64 | 326% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.96 | 15.24 | 203% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.36 | 4.32 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.13 | 24.77 | 170% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers