Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMAX vs RNWAX
BEMAX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts BEMAX vs RNWAX
BEMAX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMAX vs. RNWAX commentary
Jun 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMAX is a Hold and RNWAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. BEMAX (1.34B). BEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: BEMAX (1.68) vs RNWAX (0.49). BEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: BEMAX (15 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than BEMAX (1.32). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. BEMAX (1.27). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMAX: RNWAX (250) vs BEMAX (2500). BEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 52.06 vs. RNWAX (25.45). BEMAX return over 5 years is better than : 78.33 vs. RNWAX (14.04).
| BEMAX | RNWAX | BEMAX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.66 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.66 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.535 | 16.280 | 138% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.34B | 90.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.68 | 0.49 | 345% |
| Returns for 1 year | 52.06 | 25.45 | 205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.93 | 46.33 | 205% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.33 | 14.04 | 558% |
| Returns for 10 years | 150.58 | 115.55 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers