Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMAX vs RNWAX
BEMAX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts BEMAX vs RNWAX
BEMAX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMAX vs. RNWAX commentary
Aug 29, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMAX is a Buy and RNWAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. BEMAX (1.34B). BEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: BEMAX (1.79) vs RNWAX (0.50). BEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: BEMAX (16 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than BEMAX (1.32). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. BEMAX (18.56). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMAX: RNWAX (250) vs BEMAX (2500). BEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.17 vs. RNWAX (19.29). BEMAX return over 5 years is better than : 91.50 vs. RNWAX (14.04).
| BEMAX | RNWAX | BEMAX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.66 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.66 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.101 | 15.987 | 151% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.34B | 88.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 0.50 | 360% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.17 | 19.29 | 219% |
| Returns for 3 years | 96.13 | 47.26 | 203% |
| Returns for 5 years | 91.50 | 14.04 | 652% |
| Returns for 10 years | 129.09 | 99.54 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers