Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMAX vs RNWHX
BEMAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BEMAX vs RNWHX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value A
Price$10.17
Change+$0.08 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets725.02M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$88.02
Change+$0.29 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.95B
BEMAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMAX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 69.9B vs. BEMAX (725M). BEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: BEMAX (2.44) vs RNWHX (0.99). BEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BEMAX (14 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). BEMAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEMAX (21.13). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMAX: RNWHX (250) vs BEMAX (2500). BEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.09 vs. RNWHX (12.22). BEMAX return over 5 years is better than : 62.12 vs. RNWHX (31.70).
| BEMAX | RNWHX | BEMAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.72 | 183% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.72 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.881 | 15.785 | 139% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 725M | 69.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.44 | 0.99 | 247% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.09 | 12.22 | 197% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.41 | 39.15 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.12 | 31.70 | 196% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.20 | N/A | - |