Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMAX vs RNWHX
BEMAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BEMAX vs RNWHX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value A
Price$11.08
Change+$0.02 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets796.35M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$92.77
Change+$0.17 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.99B
BEMAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMAX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 73B vs. BEMAX (796M). BEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: BEMAX (2.31) vs RNWHX (0.97). BEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BEMAX (15 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). BEMAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEMAX (21.13). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMAX: RNWHX (250) vs BEMAX (2500). BEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.01 vs. RNWHX (16.76). BEMAX return over 5 years is better than : 71.16 vs. RNWHX (30.81).
| BEMAX | RNWHX | BEMAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.72 | 183% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.72 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.840 | 22.034 | 154% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 796M | 73B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.31 | 0.97 | 239% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.01 | 16.76 | 203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 82.45 | 45.42 | 182% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.16 | 30.81 | 231% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.54 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement