Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMAX vs RNWHX
BEMAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BEMAX vs RNWHX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value A
Price$9.94
Change+$0.03 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets712.86M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$86.06
Change+$0.33 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.33B
BEMAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMAX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 68.3B vs. BEMAX (713M). BEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: BEMAX (2.51) vs RNWHX (1.04). BEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BEMAX (14 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). BEMAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEMAX (27.76). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMAX: RNWHX (250) vs BEMAX (2500). BEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.74 vs. RNWHX (10.15). BEMAX return over 5 years is better than : 55.43 vs. RNWHX (35.19).
| BEMAX | RNWHX | BEMAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.72 | 183% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.72 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.757 | 13.207 | 142% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 713M | 68.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.51 | 1.04 | 242% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.74 | 10.15 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.85 | 31.69 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.43 | 35.19 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.72 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement