Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMAX vs RNWHX
BEMAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BEMAX vs RNWHX
BEMAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMAX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. BEMAX (1.34B). BEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: BEMAX (1.68) vs RNWHX (1.15). BEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BEMAX (15 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). BEMAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. BEMAX (1.27). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMAX: RNWHX (250) vs BEMAX (2500). BEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 52.06 vs. RNWHX (26.83). BEMAX return over 5 years is better than : 78.33 vs. RNWHX (19.00).
| BEMAX | RNWHX | BEMAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.72 | 183% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.72 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.535 | 16.774 | 134% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.34B | 90.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.68 | 1.15 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 52.06 | 26.83 | 194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.93 | 50.96 | 186% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.33 | 19.00 | 412% |
| Returns for 10 years | 150.58 | 125.74 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers