Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMAX vs RNWHX
BEMAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BEMAX vs RNWHX
BEMAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Aug 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMAX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. BEMAX (1.33B). BEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: BEMAX (1.79) vs RNWHX (1.17). BEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BEMAX (16 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). BEMAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. BEMAX (18.56). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMAX: RNWHX (250) vs BEMAX (2500). BEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.63 vs. RNWHX (20.97). BEMAX return over 5 years is better than : 89.70 vs. RNWHX (17.46).
| BEMAX | RNWHX | BEMAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.72 | 183% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.72 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.931 | 15.251 | 150% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.33B | 90.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 1.17 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.63 | 20.97 | 198% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.52 | 48.57 | 195% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.70 | 17.46 | 514% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.09 | 106.97 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers