Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMCX vs RNWAX
BEMCX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts BEMCX vs RNWAX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value C
Price$10.53
Change+$0.04 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets775.72M
American Funds New World R1
Price$86.80
Change+$0.30 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.77B
BEMCX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMCX vs. RNWAX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMCX is a Buy and RNWAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. BEMCX (776M). BEMCX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: BEMCX (1.91) vs RNWAX (0.00). BEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: BEMCX (13 years) vs RNWAX (23 years). BEMCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than RNWAX (1.66). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEMCX (21.13). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMCX: RNWAX (250) vs BEMCX (2500). BEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.96 vs. RNWAX (12.00). BEMCX return over 5 years is better than : 55.30 vs. RNWAX (18.17).
| BEMCX | RNWAX | BEMCX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 1.66 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 1.66 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.595 | 17.887 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 776M | 71.8B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.91 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.96 | 12.00 | 225% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.06 | 36.06 | 189% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.30 | 18.17 | 304% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.99 | 81.02 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement