Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMCX vs RNWAX
BEMCX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts BEMCX vs RNWAX
BEMCX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMCX vs. RNWAX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMCX is a Hold and RNWAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. BEMCX (1.3B). BEMCX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: BEMCX (1.35) vs RNWAX (0.49). BEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: BEMCX (14 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). BEMCX (2.02) is less costly to investors than RNWAX (1.66). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. BEMCX (18.56). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMCX: RNWAX (250) vs BEMCX (2500). BEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.32 vs. RNWAX (13.55). BEMCX return over 5 years is better than : 82.47 vs. RNWAX (12.13).
| BEMCX | RNWAX | BEMCX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 1.66 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 1.66 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.811 | 14.117 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.3B | 90B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 0.49 | 277% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.32 | 13.55 | 246% |
| Returns for 3 years | 91.15 | 47.26 | 193% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.47 | 12.13 | 680% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.10 | 98.10 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement