Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMCX vs RNWFX
BEMCX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts BEMCX vs RNWFX
BEMCX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMCX vs. RNWFX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMCX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. BEMCX (1.3B). BEMCX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: BEMCX (1.35) vs RNWFX (1.20). BEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: BEMCX (14 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). BEMCX (2.02) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. BEMCX (18.56). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMCX: RNWFX (250) vs BEMCX (2500). BEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.32 vs. RNWFX (14.99). BEMCX return over 5 years is better than : 82.47 vs. RNWFX (17.73).
| BEMCX | RNWFX | BEMCX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 0.62 | 326% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 0.62 | 326% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.811 | 14.935 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.3B | 90B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 1.20 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.32 | 14.99 | 222% |
| Returns for 3 years | 91.15 | 52.55 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.47 | 17.73 | 465% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.10 | 110.22 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement