Ad is loading...
BEMIX vs FWWNX
BEMIX vs FWWNX Comparison
Open Charts BEMIX vs FWWNX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value I
Price$8.77
Change-$0.15 (-1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets645.14M
American Funds New World 529-F-3
Price$76.69
Change-$1.86 (-2.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.34B
BEMIX vs FWWNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWNX has more cash in the bank: 62.3B vs. BEMIX (645M). BEMIX pays higher dividends than FWWNX: BEMIX (2.90) vs FWWNX (1.18). BEMIX was incepted earlier than FWWNX: BEMIX (14 years) vs FWWNX (4 years). BEMIX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FWWNX (0.63). FWWNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEMIX (27.76). FWWNX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMIX: FWWNX (250) vs BEMIX (100000). BEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.38 vs. FWWNX (-1.56).
| BEMIX | FWWNX | BEMIX / FWWNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.63 | 178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.63 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.813 | 0.052 | 11,138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 645M | 62.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.90 | 1.18 | 246% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.38 | -1.56 | -346% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.91 | 1.36 | 1,752% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.12 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.65 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...