Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMIX vs FWWNX
BEMIX vs FWWNX Comparison
Open Charts BEMIX vs FWWNX
BEMIX vs FWWNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWNX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. BEMIX (1.34B). BEMIX pays higher dividends than FWWNX: BEMIX (1.76) vs FWWNX (1.21). BEMIX was incepted earlier than FWWNX: BEMIX (15 years) vs FWWNX (6 years). BEMIX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FWWNX (0.62). FWWNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. BEMIX (1.27). FWWNX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMIX: FWWNX (250) vs BEMIX (100000). BEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 52.93 vs. FWWNX (28.25). BEMIX return over 5 years is better than : 81.71 vs. FWWNX (21.60).
| BEMIX | FWWNX | BEMIX / FWWNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.62 | 179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.62 | 179% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.104 | 16.796 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.34B | 90.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 1.21 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 52.93 | 28.25 | 187% |
| Returns for 3 years | 95.38 | 51.24 | 186% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.71 | 21.60 | 378% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement