Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMIX vs RNWAX
BEMIX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts BEMIX vs RNWAX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value I
Price$10.71
Change-$0.07 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets775.72M
American Funds New World R1
Price$86.50
Change-$0.04 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.77B
BEMIX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMIX vs. RNWAX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMIX is a Buy and RNWAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. BEMIX (776M). BEMIX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: BEMIX (2.48) vs RNWAX (0.00). BEMIX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: BEMIX (15 years) vs RNWAX (23 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than BEMIX (1.11). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEMIX (21.13). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMIX: RNWAX (250) vs BEMIX (100000). BEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.42 vs. RNWAX (10.85). BEMIX return over 5 years is better than : 63.06 vs. RNWAX (17.76).
| BEMIX | RNWAX | BEMIX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.66 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.66 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.332 | 17.479 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 776M | 71.8B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.42 | 10.85 | 262% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.30 | 34.75 | 211% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.06 | 17.76 | 355% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.55 | 79.02 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement