Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMIX vs RNWAX
BEMIX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts BEMIX vs RNWAX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value I
Price$11.44
Change-$0.08 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets842.58M
American Funds New World R1
Price$91.07
Change-$0.30 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.16B
BEMIX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMIX vs. RNWAX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMIX is a StrongBuy and RNWAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. BEMIX (843M). BEMIX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: BEMIX (2.48) vs RNWAX (0.00). BEMIX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: BEMIX (15 years) vs RNWAX (23 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than BEMIX (1.11). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEMIX (21.13). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMIX: RNWAX (250) vs BEMIX (100000). BEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.81 vs. RNWAX (11.50). BEMIX return over 5 years is better than : 78.20 vs. RNWAX (25.36).
| BEMIX | RNWAX | BEMIX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.66 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.66 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 38.083 | 23.686 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 843M | 75.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.81 | 11.50 | 207% |
| Returns for 3 years | 100.34 | 54.36 | 185% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.20 | 25.36 | 308% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.67 | 86.11 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement