Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMIX vs RNWAX
BEMIX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts BEMIX vs RNWAX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value I
Price$11.34
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets812.67M
American Funds New World R1
Price$90.32
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.08B
BEMIX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMIX vs. RNWAX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMIX is a Buy and RNWAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. BEMIX (813M). BEMIX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: BEMIX (2.41) vs RNWAX (0.00). BEMIX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: BEMIX (15 years) vs RNWAX (23 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than BEMIX (1.11). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEMIX (21.13). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMIX: RNWAX (250) vs BEMIX (100000). BEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.29 vs. RNWAX (15.82). BEMIX return over 5 years is better than : 73.94 vs. RNWAX (26.96).
| BEMIX | RNWAX | BEMIX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.66 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.66 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.930 | 22.667 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 813M | 74.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.29 | 15.82 | 223% |
| Returns for 3 years | 88.32 | 46.83 | 189% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.94 | 26.96 | 274% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.61 | 89.58 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement