Ad is loading...
BEMIX vs RNWAX
BEMIX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts BEMIX vs RNWAX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value I
Price$8.77
Change-$0.15 (-1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets645.14M
American Funds New World R1
Price$73.48
Change-$1.79 (-2.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.34B
BEMIX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMIX vs. RNWAX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMIX is a Hold and RNWAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 62.3B vs. BEMIX (645M). BEMIX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: BEMIX (2.90) vs RNWAX (0.00). BEMIX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: BEMIX (14 years) vs RNWAX (23 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than BEMIX (1.12). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEMIX (27.76). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMIX: RNWAX (250) vs BEMIX (100000). BEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.38 vs. RNWAX (-2.64). BEMIX return over 5 years is better than : 69.12 vs. RNWAX (44.35).
| BEMIX | RNWAX | BEMIX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.66 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.66 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.813 | -0.204 | -2,853% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 645M | 62.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.90 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.38 | -2.64 | -204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.91 | -1.99 | -1,201% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.12 | 44.35 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.65 | 35.53 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...