Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMIX vs RNWAX
BEMIX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts BEMIX vs RNWAX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value I
Price$10.29
Change+$0.06 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets728.04M
American Funds New World R1
Price$84.82
Change+$0.16 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.94B
BEMIX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMIX vs. RNWAX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMIX is a Hold and RNWAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 69.9B vs. BEMIX (728M). BEMIX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: BEMIX (2.54) vs RNWAX (0.00). BEMIX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: BEMIX (14 years) vs RNWAX (23 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than BEMIX (1.12). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEMIX (21.13). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMIX: RNWAX (250) vs BEMIX (100000). BEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.17 vs. RNWAX (8.11). BEMIX return over 5 years is better than : 62.80 vs. RNWAX (24.90).
| BEMIX | RNWAX | BEMIX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.66 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.66 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.733 | 15.198 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 728M | 69.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.17 | 8.11 | 261% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.74 | 37.80 | 182% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.80 | 24.90 | 252% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.10 | 59.60 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement