Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMIX vs RNWAX
BEMIX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts BEMIX vs RNWAX
BEMIX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMIX vs. RNWAX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMIX is a Hold and RNWAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. BEMIX (1.34B). BEMIX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: BEMIX (1.76) vs RNWAX (0.49). BEMIX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: BEMIX (15 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than BEMIX (1.11). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. BEMIX (1.27). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMIX: RNWAX (250) vs BEMIX (100000). BEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 52.93 vs. RNWAX (26.75). BEMIX return over 5 years is better than : 81.71 vs. RNWAX (14.77).
| BEMIX | RNWAX | BEMIX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.66 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.66 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.104 | 16.280 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.34B | 90.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 0.49 | 361% |
| Returns for 1 year | 52.93 | 26.75 | 198% |
| Returns for 3 years | 95.38 | 46.33 | 206% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.71 | 14.77 | 553% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.45 | 115.55 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers