Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMIX vs RNWAX
BEMIX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts BEMIX vs RNWAX
BEMIX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMIX vs. RNWAX commentary
Aug 30, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMIX is a Buy and RNWAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. BEMIX (1.34B). BEMIX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: BEMIX (1.89) vs RNWAX (0.50). BEMIX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: BEMIX (16 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than BEMIX (1.11). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. BEMIX (18.56). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMIX: RNWAX (250) vs BEMIX (100000). BEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.37 vs. RNWAX (19.29). BEMIX return over 5 years is better than : 93.34 vs. RNWAX (14.04).
| BEMIX | RNWAX | BEMIX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.66 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.66 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.209 | 15.987 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.34B | 88.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.89 | 0.50 | 380% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.37 | 19.29 | 220% |
| Returns for 3 years | 97.19 | 47.26 | 206% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.34 | 14.04 | 665% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.62 | 99.54 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers