Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMIX vs RNWFX
BEMIX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts BEMIX vs RNWFX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value I
Price$11.34
Change-$0.03 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets823.69M
American Funds New World R5
Price$95.59
Change-$0.11 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.53B
BEMIX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMIX vs. RNWFX commentary
Sep 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMIX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 74.5B vs. BEMIX (824M). BEMIX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: BEMIX (2.41) vs RNWFX (1.01). BEMIX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: BEMIX (15 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). BEMIX (1.11) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEMIX (21.13). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMIX: RNWFX (250) vs BEMIX (100000). BEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.94 vs. RNWFX (15.96). BEMIX return over 5 years is better than : 74.09 vs. RNWFX (32.70).
| BEMIX | RNWFX | BEMIX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.62 | 179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.62 | 179% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 36.050 | 23.725 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 824M | 74.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.41 | 1.01 | 238% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.94 | 15.96 | 206% |
| Returns for 3 years | 88.78 | 50.47 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.09 | 32.70 | 227% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.93 | 102.76 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement