Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMIX vs RNWFX
BEMIX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts BEMIX vs RNWFX
BEMIX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMIX vs. RNWFX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMIX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. BEMIX (1.3B). BEMIX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: BEMIX (1.86) vs RNWFX (1.20). BEMIX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: BEMIX (16 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). BEMIX (1.11) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. BEMIX (18.56). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMIX: RNWFX (250) vs BEMIX (100000). BEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.56 vs. RNWFX (14.99). BEMIX return over 5 years is better than : 91.32 vs. RNWFX (17.73).
| BEMIX | RNWFX | BEMIX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.62 | 179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.62 | 179% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.634 | 14.935 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.3B | 90B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 1.20 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.56 | 14.99 | 231% |
| Returns for 3 years | 96.60 | 52.55 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 91.32 | 17.73 | 515% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.01 | 110.22 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement