Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMIX vs RNWHX
BEMIX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BEMIX vs RNWHX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value I
Price$10.49
Change+$0.05 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets743.49M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$88.04
Change+$0.21 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.83B
BEMIX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMIX vs. RNWHX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMIX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 69.8B vs. BEMIX (743M). BEMIX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: BEMIX (2.48) vs RNWHX (1.00). BEMIX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BEMIX (15 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). BEMIX (1.12) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEMIX (21.13). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMIX: RNWHX (250) vs BEMIX (100000). BEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.33 vs. RNWHX (17.76). BEMIX return over 5 years is better than : 63.16 vs. RNWHX (25.04).
| BEMIX | RNWHX | BEMIX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.72 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.72 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.253 | 15.812 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 743M | 69.8B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 1.00 | 249% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.33 | 17.76 | 188% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.08 | 32.74 | 205% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.16 | 25.04 | 252% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.24 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement