Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMIX vs RNWHX
BEMIX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BEMIX vs RNWHX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value I
Price$11.44
Change-$0.08 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets842.58M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$94.70
Change-$0.31 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.16B
BEMIX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMIX vs. RNWHX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMIX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. BEMIX (843M). BEMIX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: BEMIX (2.48) vs RNWHX (0.93). BEMIX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BEMIX (15 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). BEMIX (1.11) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEMIX (21.13). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMIX: RNWHX (250) vs BEMIX (100000). BEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.81 vs. RNWHX (12.65). BEMIX return over 5 years is better than : 78.20 vs. RNWHX (30.19).
| BEMIX | RNWHX | BEMIX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.72 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.72 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 38.083 | 24.572 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 843M | 75.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 0.93 | 267% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.81 | 12.65 | 188% |
| Returns for 3 years | 100.34 | 57.51 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.20 | 30.19 | 259% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.67 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement