Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMIX vs RNWHX
BEMIX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BEMIX vs RNWHX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value I
Price$10.71
Change-$0.07 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets775.72M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$89.85
Change-$0.04 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.77B
BEMIX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMIX vs. RNWHX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMIX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. BEMIX (776M). BEMIX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: BEMIX (2.48) vs RNWHX (1.00). BEMIX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BEMIX (15 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). BEMIX (1.11) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEMIX (21.13). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMIX: RNWHX (250) vs BEMIX (100000). BEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.42 vs. RNWHX (11.99). BEMIX return over 5 years is better than : 63.06 vs. RNWHX (22.32).
| BEMIX | RNWHX | BEMIX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.72 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.72 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.332 | 18.193 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 776M | 71.8B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 1.00 | 249% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.42 | 11.99 | 237% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.30 | 37.51 | 195% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.06 | 22.32 | 283% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.55 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement