Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMIX vs RNWHX
BEMIX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BEMIX vs RNWHX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value I
Price$10.18
Change+$0.08 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets722.19M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$87.64
Change+$0.19 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.7B
BEMIX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMIX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMIX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 69.7B vs. BEMIX (722M). BEMIX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: BEMIX (2.66) vs RNWHX (1.04). BEMIX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BEMIX (14 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). BEMIX (1.12) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEMIX (21.13). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMIX: RNWHX (250) vs BEMIX (100000). BEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.52 vs. RNWHX (11.44). BEMIX return over 5 years is better than : 65.48 vs. RNWHX (35.41).
| BEMIX | RNWHX | BEMIX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.72 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.72 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.759 | 15.285 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 722M | 69.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.66 | 1.04 | 256% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.52 | 11.44 | 197% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.85 | 37.22 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.48 | 35.41 | 185% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.67 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement