Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMIX vs RNWHX
BEMIX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BEMIX vs RNWHX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value I
Price$9.89
Change+$0.03 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets700.7M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$85.04
Change+$0.19 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.63B
BEMIX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMIX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMIX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 67.6B vs. BEMIX (701M). BEMIX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: BEMIX (2.66) vs RNWHX (1.04). BEMIX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BEMIX (14 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). BEMIX (1.12) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEMIX (27.76). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMIX: RNWHX (250) vs BEMIX (100000). BEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.17 vs. RNWHX (7.68). BEMIX return over 5 years is better than : 48.31 vs. RNWHX (30.14).
| BEMIX | RNWHX | BEMIX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.72 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.72 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.963 | 11.865 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 701M | 67.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.66 | 1.04 | 256% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.17 | 7.68 | 198% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.58 | 23.56 | 193% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.31 | 30.14 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.06 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement