Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMIX vs RNWHX
BEMIX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BEMIX vs RNWHX
BEMIX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMIX vs. RNWHX commentary
Aug 30, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMIX is a Buy and RNWHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. BEMIX (1.34B). BEMIX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: BEMIX (1.89) vs RNWHX (1.17). BEMIX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BEMIX (16 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). BEMIX (1.11) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. BEMIX (18.56). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMIX: RNWHX (250) vs BEMIX (100000). BEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.37 vs. RNWHX (20.60). BEMIX return over 5 years is better than : 93.34 vs. RNWHX (18.98).
| BEMIX | RNWHX | BEMIX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.72 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.72 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.209 | 16.697 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.34B | 88.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.89 | 1.17 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.37 | 20.60 | 206% |
| Returns for 3 years | 97.19 | 51.90 | 187% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.34 | 18.98 | 492% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.62 | 109.02 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers