Ad is loading...
BEMRX vs RNWAX
BEMRX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts BEMRX vs RNWAX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value R6
Price$9.70
Change+$0.05 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets677.99M
American Funds New World R1
Price$80.19
Change+$0.38 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.93B
BEMRX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMRX vs. RNWAX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMRX is a Buy and RNWAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 65.9B vs. BEMRX (678M). BEMRX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: BEMRX (2.90) vs RNWAX (0.00). BEMRX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: BEMRX (9 years) vs RNWAX (23 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than BEMRX (1.08). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEMRX (27.76). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMRX: RNWAX (250) vs BEMRX (1000000). BEMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.29 vs. RNWAX (4.56). BEMRX return over 5 years is better than : 72.70 vs. RNWAX (39.33).
| BEMRX | RNWAX | BEMRX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.66 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.66 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.396 | 8.393 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 678M | 65.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.90 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.29 | 4.56 | 226% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.53 | 24.65 | 197% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.70 | 39.33 | 185% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 45.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers