Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMRX vs RNWAX
BEMRX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts BEMRX vs RNWAX
BEMRX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMRX vs. RNWAX commentary
Aug 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMRX is a StrongBuy and RNWAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. BEMRX (1.33B). BEMRX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: BEMRX (1.94) vs RNWAX (0.50). BEMRX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: BEMRX (10 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than BEMRX (1.10). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. BEMRX (18.56). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMRX: RNWAX (250) vs BEMRX (1000000). BEMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.03 vs. RNWAX (19.65). BEMRX return over 5 years is better than : 92.69 vs. RNWAX (12.57).
| BEMRX | RNWAX | BEMRX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.66 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.66 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.094 | 14.601 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.33B | 90.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.94 | 0.50 | 390% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.03 | 19.65 | 214% |
| Returns for 3 years | 96.46 | 44.02 | 219% |
| Returns for 5 years | 92.69 | 12.57 | 738% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.31 | 97.57 | 135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers