Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMRX vs RNWAX
BEMRX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts BEMRX vs RNWAX
BEMRX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMRX vs. RNWAX commentary
Sep 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMRX is a Buy and RNWAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. BEMRX (1.34B). BEMRX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: BEMRX (1.94) vs RNWAX (0.49). BEMRX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: BEMRX (10 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than BEMRX (1.10). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. BEMRX (18.56). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMRX: RNWAX (250) vs BEMRX (1000000). BEMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.19 vs. RNWAX (19.13). BEMRX return over 5 years is better than : 90.77 vs. RNWAX (11.53).
| BEMRX | RNWAX | BEMRX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.66 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.66 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.326 | 15.412 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.34B | 88.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.94 | 0.49 | 397% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.19 | 19.13 | 226% |
| Returns for 3 years | 99.15 | 47.01 | 211% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.77 | 11.53 | 787% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.92 | 97.87 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement