Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMRX vs RNWBX
BEMRX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts BEMRX vs RNWBX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value R6
Price$11.96
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets896.23M
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.39
Change-$0.11 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.13B
BEMRX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMRX vs. RNWBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMRX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. BEMRX (896M). BEMRX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: BEMRX (2.43) vs RNWBX (0.12). BEMRX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: BEMRX (9 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than BEMRX (1.10). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEMRX (21.13). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMRX: RNWBX (250) vs BEMRX (1000000). BEMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.99 vs. RNWBX (17.87). BEMRX return over 5 years is better than : 66.81 vs. RNWBX (15.89).
| BEMRX | RNWBX | BEMRX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.67 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.67 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 43.072 | 22.896 | 188% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 896M | 74.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.43 | 0.12 | 2,073% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.99 | 17.87 | 224% |
| Returns for 3 years | 91.37 | 43.03 | 212% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.81 | 15.89 | 420% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.21 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement