Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMRX vs RNWFX
BEMRX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts BEMRX vs RNWFX
BEMRX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMRX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMRX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. BEMRX (1.36B). BEMRX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: BEMRX (1.81) vs RNWFX (1.20). BEMRX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: BEMRX (10 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). BEMRX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. BEMRX (1.27). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMRX: RNWFX (250) vs BEMRX (1000000). BEMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.76 vs. RNWFX (31.39). BEMRX return over 5 years is better than : 85.70 vs. RNWFX (20.98).
| BEMRX | RNWFX | BEMRX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.62 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.62 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.166 | 18.794 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.36B | 90.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.81 | 1.20 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 55.76 | 31.39 | 178% |
| Returns for 3 years | 88.88 | 58.06 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.70 | 20.98 | 408% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 135.60 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement