BENF
Price
$0.34
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
18.83M
CGBD
Price
$13.81
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
826.94M
80 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BENF vs CGBD

Header iconBENF vs CGBD Comparison
Open Charts BENF vs CGBDBanner chart's image
Beneficient
Price$0.34
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$55.34K
Capitalization18.83M
Carlyle Secured Lending
Price$13.81
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$198.23K
Capitalization826.94M
BENF vs CGBD Comparison Chart
Loading...
BENF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CGBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BENF vs. CGBD commentary
May 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BENF is a Buy and CGBD is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 25, 2025
Stock price -- (BENF: $0.34 vs. CGBD: $13.81)
Brand notoriety: BENF and CGBD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BENF: 49% vs. CGBD: 48%
Market capitalization -- BENF: $18.83M vs. CGBD: $826.94M
BENF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $18.83M. CGBD’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $826.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BENF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCGBD’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BENF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CGBD’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGBD is a better buy in the long-term than BENF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BENF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CGBD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BENF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CGBD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BENF is a better buy in the short-term than CGBD.

Price Growth

BENF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +6.29% price change this week, while CGBD (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

BENF is expected to report earnings on Feb 23, 2023.

CGBD is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.81% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBD($827M) has a higher market cap than BENF($18.8M). CGBD YTD gains are higher at: -20.900 vs. BENF (-54.600). CGBD has more cash in the bank: 22.7M vs. BENF (11.2M). BENF has less debt than CGBD: BENF (48.7M) vs CGBD (979M). CGBD has higher revenues than BENF: CGBD (101M) vs BENF (-74.27M).
BENFCGBDBENF / CGBD
Capitalization18.8M827M2%
EBITDA-2.49BN/A-
Gain YTD-54.600-20.900261%
P/E RatioN/A9.82-
Revenue-74.27M101M-74%
Total Cash11.2M22.7M49%
Total Debt48.7M979M5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGBD: Fundamental Ratings
CGBD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
16
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BENFCGBD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BENF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CGBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HOV90.911.59
+1.78%
Hovnanian Enterprises
XELB2.440.04
+1.67%
Xcel Brands Inc
OPAD0.980.01
+1.10%
Offerpad Solutions
SBAC229.521.25
+0.55%
SBA Communications Corp
MAC14.89-0.33
-2.17%
Macerich Company (The)

BENF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BENF and BBXIA have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BENF and BBXIA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BENF
1D Price
Change %
BENF100%
-0.50%
BBXIA - BENF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLFPY - BENF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSDL - BENF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
CGBD - BENF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CWD - BENF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.63%
More

CGBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBD has been closely correlated with GLAD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBD jumps, then GLAD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGBD
1D Price
Change %
CGBD100%
N/A
GLAD - CGBD
73%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
FSK - CGBD
72%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
TSLX - CGBD
71%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
PFLT - CGBD
71%
Closely correlated
+0.30%
BCSF - CGBD
71%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
More