Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEQGX vs RWMFX
BEQGX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts BEQGX vs RWMFX
BEQGX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEQGX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEQGX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. BEQGX (1.96B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than BEQGX: RWMFX (1.40) vs BEQGX (0.50). BEQGX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: BEQGX (35 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). BEQGX (0.65) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). BEQGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEQGX: RWMFX (250) vs BEQGX (2500). BEQGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.43 vs. RWMFX (8.10). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.71 vs. BEQGX (13.02).
| BEQGX | RWMFX | BEQGX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.31 | 210% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.31 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.336 | 5.575 | 185% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.96B | 214B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.40 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.43 | 8.10 | 228% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.13 | 33.11 | 203% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.02 | 26.71 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.68 | 85.42 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement