Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEXFX vs RNWAX
BEXFX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts BEXFX vs RNWAX
BEXFX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEXFX vs. RNWAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEXFX is a Hold and RNWAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. BEXFX (3.78B). BEXFX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: BEXFX (1.55) vs RNWAX (0.49). BEXFX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: BEXFX (16 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than BEXFX (1.38). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. BEXFX (39.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEXFX: RNWAX (250) vs BEXFX (2000). BEXFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.06 vs. RNWAX (15.91). BEXFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.67 vs. RNWAX (12.78).
| BEXFX | RNWAX | BEXFX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 1.66 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 1.66 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.570 | 15.694 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.78B | 90B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.55 | 0.49 | 317% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.06 | 15.91 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.83 | 49.14 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.67 | 12.78 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.07 | 101.85 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement