BFAM
Price
$109.18
Change
-$4.15 (-3.66%)
Updated
Sep 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.45B
50 days until earnings call
EM
Price
$1.36
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
344.89M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BFAM vs EM

Header iconBFAM vs EM Comparison
Open Charts BFAM vs EMBanner chart's image
Bright Horizons Family Solutions
Price$109.18
Change-$4.15 (-3.66%)
Volume$14.2K
Capitalization6.45B
Smart Share Global
Price$1.36
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.55K
Capitalization344.89M
BFAM vs EM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BFAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFAM vs. EM commentary
Sep 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFAM is a Hold and EM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 15, 2025
Stock price -- (BFAM: $113.33 vs. EM: $1.36)
Brand notoriety: BFAM and EM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Personnel Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFAM: 90% vs. EM: 21%
Market capitalization -- BFAM: $6.45B vs. EM: $344.89M
BFAM [@Personnel Services] is valued at $6.45B. EM’s [@Personnel Services] market capitalization is $344.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $27.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFAM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BFAM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EM is a better buy in the long-term than BFAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFAM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • EM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BFAM and EM are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BFAM (@Personnel Services) experienced а -2.99% price change this week, while EM (@Personnel Services) price change was +0.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +208.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFAM is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Personnel Services (-0.87% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BFAM($6.45B) has a higher market cap than EM($345M). EM has higher P/E ratio than BFAM: EM (64.39) vs BFAM (37.16). EM YTD gains are higher at: 88.889 vs. BFAM (2.237). BFAM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 375M vs. EM (101M). EM has more cash in the bank: 3.04B vs. BFAM (179M). EM has less debt than BFAM: EM (10.6M) vs BFAM (1.75B). BFAM has higher revenues than EM: BFAM (2.79B) vs EM (1.96B).
BFAMEMBFAM / EM
Capitalization6.45B345M1,868%
EBITDA375M101M371%
Gain YTD2.23788.8893%
P/E Ratio37.1664.3958%
Revenue2.79B1.96B142%
Total Cash179M3.04B6%
Total Debt1.75B10.6M16,519%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFAM: Fundamental Ratings
BFAM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
68
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
59
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
80
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFAMEM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BFAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ATOXF0.13N/A
+3.17%
QUANTUM CRITICAL METALS CORP.
NURPF13.59N/A
N/A
Neuren Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
PECGF0.86N/A
N/A
Petronas Chemicals Group Bhd
IPNAF28.75N/A
N/A
Information Planning Co., Ltd.
DBSDY161.45-3.18
-1.93%
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.

BFAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFAM has been loosely correlated with MCW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BFAM jumps, then MCW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFAM
1D Price
Change %
BFAM100%
-0.70%
MCW - BFAM
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.99%
TNL - BFAM
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
ABNB - BFAM
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
CCL - BFAM
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.96%
RCL - BFAM
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.94%
More