Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFGBX vs RGAGX
BFGBX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts BFGBX vs RGAGX
BFGBX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFGBX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFGBX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. BFGBX (3.89B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than BFGBX: RGAGX (0.51) vs BFGBX (0.00). BFGBX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: BFGBX (28 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). BFGBX (0.65) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. BFGBX (29.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than BFGBX: RGAGX (250) vs BFGBX (5000000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.55 vs. BFGBX (7.14). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 20.99 vs. BFGBX (3.50).
| BFGBX | RGAGX | BFGBX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.29 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.29 | 224% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.594 | 8.887 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.89B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.14 | 12.55 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.77 | 50.34 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.50 | 20.99 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.10 | 122.10 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement