Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFGBX vs RGAHX
BFGBX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts BFGBX vs RGAHX
BFGBX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFGBX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFGBX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. BFGBX (3.73B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than BFGBX: RGAHX (0.40) vs BFGBX (0.00). BFGBX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: BFGBX (29 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). BFGBX (0.65) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). BFGBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BFGBX: RGAHX (250) vs BFGBX (5000000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.18 vs. BFGBX (-13.09). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.78 vs. BFGBX (-12.12).
| BFGBX | RGAHX | BFGBX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.44 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.44 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.867 | 9.200 | -64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.73B | 353B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.09 | 0.18 | -7,288% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.14 | 43.47 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.12 | 13.78 | -88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.38 | 106.68 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement