Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFGFX vs FSMAX
BFGFX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BFGFX vs FSMAX
Baron Focused Growth Retail
Price$50.06
Change+$1.37 (+2.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.71B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$96.78
Change+$0.13 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.46B
BFGFX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFGFX vs. FSMAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFGFX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.5B vs. BFGFX (2.71B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than BFGFX: FSMAX (0.43) vs BFGFX (0.00). BFGFX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BFGFX (17 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). BFGFX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. BFGFX (6.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BFGFX: FSMAX (0) vs BFGFX (2000). BFGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.78 vs. FSMAX (3.62). BFGFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.86 vs. FSMAX (33.53).
| BFGFX | FSMAX | BFGFX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.04 | 3,743% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.04 | 3,743% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.047 | 6.492 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.71B | 41.5B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.78 | 3.62 | 353% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.09 | 49.92 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.86 | 33.53 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 274.20 | 94.09 | 291% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers