Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFGFX vs FSMAX
BFGFX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BFGFX vs FSMAX
Baron Focused Growth Retail
Price$49.64
Change-$0.59 (-1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.56B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.47
Change+$0.80 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
BFGFX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFGFX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFGFX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. BFGFX (2.56B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than BFGFX: FSMAX (0.47) vs BFGFX (0.00). BFGFX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BFGFX (17 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). BFGFX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. BFGFX (6.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BFGFX: FSMAX (0) vs BFGFX (2000). BFGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.11 vs. FSMAX (8.54). BFGFX return over 5 years is better than : 86.38 vs. FSMAX (56.52).
| BFGFX | FSMAX | BFGFX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.04 | 3,743% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.04 | 3,743% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.397 | 3.070 | 208% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.56B | 39.2B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.11 | 8.54 | 364% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.34 | 51.26 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.38 | 56.52 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 224.18 | 76.23 | 294% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement