Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFGFX vs FSMAX
BFGFX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BFGFX vs FSMAX
BFGFX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFGFX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFGFX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. BFGFX (4.83B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than BFGFX: FSMAX (0.50) vs BFGFX (0.00). BFGFX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BFGFX (18 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). BFGFX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. BFGFX (8.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BFGFX: FSMAX (0) vs BFGFX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. BFGFX (13.06). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. BFGFX (27.22).
| BFGFX | FSMAX | BFGFX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.04 | 3,743% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.04 | 3,743% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.928 | 13.370 | -14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.83B | 40.1B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.06 | 20.57 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.27 | 55.83 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.22 | 33.18 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 321.37 | 133.82 | 240% |