Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFGFX vs PAMCX
BFGFX vs PAMCX Comparison
Open Charts BFGFX vs PAMCX
Baron Focused Growth Retail
Price$51.12
Change-$0.33 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.67B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$96.60
Change-$0.46 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.31B
BFGFX vs PAMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFGFX vs. PAMCX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFGFX is a Buy and PAMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 27.3B vs. BFGFX (2.67B). BFGFX (0.00) and PAMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . BFGFX was incepted earlier than PAMCX: BFGFX (17 years) vs PAMCX (25 years). BFGFX (1.31) is less costly to investors than PAMCX (1.01). PAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. BFGFX (6.00). BFGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAMCX: BFGFX (2000) vs PAMCX (2500). BFGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.13 vs. PAMCX (-4.99). BFGFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.92 vs. PAMCX (-1.60).
| BFGFX | PAMCX | BFGFX / PAMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.01 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.01 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.981 | 3.299 | 272% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.67B | 27.3B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.13 | -4.99 | -644% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.81 | 10.60 | 395% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.92 | -1.60 | -3,179% |
| Returns for 10 years | 284.88 | 29.05 | 981% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement