Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFGFX vs PAMCX
BFGFX vs PAMCX Comparison
Open Charts BFGFX vs PAMCX
Baron Focused Growth Retail
Price$50.38
Change-$0.10 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.56B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$95.33
Change-$0.11 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.36B
BFGFX vs PAMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFGFX vs. PAMCX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFGFX is a Hold and PAMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. BFGFX (2.56B). BFGFX (0.00) and PAMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . BFGFX was incepted earlier than PAMCX: BFGFX (17 years) vs PAMCX (25 years). BFGFX (1.31) is less costly to investors than PAMCX (1.01). PAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. BFGFX (6.00). BFGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAMCX: BFGFX (2000) vs PAMCX (2500). BFGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.56 vs. PAMCX (-0.89). BFGFX return over 5 years is better than : 78.25 vs. PAMCX (-1.04).
| BFGFX | PAMCX | BFGFX / PAMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.01 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.01 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.926 | 1.575 | 440% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.56B | 27.4B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.56 | -0.89 | -4,430% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.51 | 3.74 | 923% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.25 | -1.04 | -7,546% |
| Returns for 10 years | 245.62 | 19.61 | 1,252% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers