Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFGFX vs PAMCX
BFGFX vs PAMCX Comparison
Open Charts BFGFX vs PAMCX
BFGFX vs PAMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFGFX vs. PAMCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFGFX is a Hold and PAMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 22.5B vs. BFGFX (5.53B). BFGFX (0.00) and PAMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . BFGFX was incepted earlier than PAMCX: BFGFX (18 years) vs PAMCX (26 years). BFGFX (1.31) is less costly to investors than PAMCX (1.02). PAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.50 vs. BFGFX (8.00). BFGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAMCX: BFGFX (2000) vs PAMCX (2500). BFGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.93 vs. PAMCX (-0.23). BFGFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.20 vs. PAMCX (-21.57).
| BFGFX | PAMCX | BFGFX / PAMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.02 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.02 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.204 | 1.626 | 689% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.53B | 22.5B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.93 | -0.23 | -14,981% |
| Returns for 3 years | 87.91 | 0.15 | 57,994% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.20 | -21.57 | -210% |
| Returns for 10 years | 404.13 | 30.96 | 1,305% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement