Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFGFX vs RRMGX
BFGFX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts BFGFX vs RRMGX
Baron Focused Growth Retail
Price$50.06
Change+$1.37 (+2.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.71B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$87.68
Change+$0.02 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.05B
BFGFX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFGFX vs. RRMGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFGFX is a Hold and RRMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 25B vs. BFGFX (2.71B). BFGFX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . BFGFX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: BFGFX (17 years) vs RRMGX (23 years). BFGFX (1.31) and RRMGX (1.29) have similar cost to investors . RRMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. BFGFX (6.00). BFGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: BFGFX (2000) vs RRMGX (2500). BFGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.78 vs. RRMGX (-10.63). BFGFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.86 vs. RRMGX (-14.91).
| BFGFX | RRMGX | BFGFX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.29 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.29 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.047 | -0.296 | -2,045% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.71B | 25B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.78 | -10.63 | -120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.09 | 4.72 | 1,358% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.86 | -14.91 | -247% |
| Returns for 10 years | 274.20 | 12.67 | 2,164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers