Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFGFX vs RRMGX
BFGFX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts BFGFX vs RRMGX
Baron Focused Growth Retail
Price$50.92
Change-$0.25 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.81B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$90.20
Change-$0.67 (-0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.99B
BFGFX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFGFX vs. RRMGX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFGFX is a Buy and RRMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 27B vs. BFGFX (2.81B). BFGFX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . BFGFX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: BFGFX (17 years) vs RRMGX (23 years). BFGFX (1.31) and RRMGX (1.29) have similar cost to investors . RRMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. BFGFX (6.00). BFGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: BFGFX (2000) vs RRMGX (2500). BFGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.42 vs. RRMGX (-7.20). BFGFX return over 5 years is better than : 48.12 vs. RRMGX (-9.02).
| BFGFX | RRMGX | BFGFX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.29 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.29 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.867 | 2.593 | 303% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.81B | 27B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.42 | -7.20 | -325% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.04 | 17.52 | 411% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.12 | -9.02 | -534% |
| Returns for 10 years | 293.57 | 18.86 | 1,557% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers