Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFGFX vs RRMGX
BFGFX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts BFGFX vs RRMGX
Baron Focused Growth Retail
Price$51.12
Change-$0.33 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.67B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$90.21
Change-$0.43 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.31B
BFGFX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFGFX vs. RRMGX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFGFX is a Buy and RRMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 27.3B vs. BFGFX (2.67B). BFGFX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . BFGFX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: BFGFX (17 years) vs RRMGX (23 years). BFGFX (1.31) and RRMGX (1.29) have similar cost to investors . RRMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. BFGFX (6.00). BFGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: BFGFX (2000) vs RRMGX (2500). BFGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.13 vs. RRMGX (-5.88). BFGFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.92 vs. RRMGX (-4.56).
| BFGFX | RRMGX | BFGFX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.29 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.29 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.981 | 3.094 | 290% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.67B | 27.3B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.13 | -5.88 | -547% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.81 | 8.58 | 488% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.92 | -4.56 | -1,117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 284.88 | 23.25 | 1,225% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement