Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFGFX vs RRMGX
BFGFX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts BFGFX vs RRMGX
BFGFX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFGFX vs. RRMGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFGFX is a Buy and RRMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 21.1B vs. BFGFX (5.07B). BFGFX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . BFGFX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: BFGFX (18 years) vs RRMGX (24 years). BFGFX (1.31) and RRMGX (1.31) have similar cost to investors . RRMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.50 vs. BFGFX (8.00). BFGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: BFGFX (2000) vs RRMGX (2500). BFGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.61 vs. RRMGX (-7.87). BFGFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.97 vs. RRMGX (-29.10).
| BFGFX | RRMGX | BFGFX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.31 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.31 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.082 | -0.426 | -958% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.07B | 21.1B | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.61 | -7.87 | -211% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.28 | -5.46 | -1,342% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.97 | -29.10 | -100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 349.88 | 16.81 | 2,082% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement