BFH vs HL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFH is a StrongBuy and HL is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BFH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BFH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- HL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BFH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HL’s TA Score has 8 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BFH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- HL’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
BFH (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +4.35% price change this week, while HL (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.20% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +4.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.28%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.48%.
Reported Earning Dates
BFH is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
HL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+4.45% weekly)A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).
@Precious Metals (+0.37% weekly)The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
| BFH | HL | BFH / HL | |
| Capitalization | 1.84B | 3.01B | 61% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 124M | - |
| Gain YTD | -19.623 | 19.838 | -99% |
| P/E Ratio | 2.44 | 1111.11 | 0% |
| Revenue | 4.3B | 720M | 597% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 106M | - |
| Total Debt | 5.44B | 663M | 821% |
BFH | HL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 26 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | 64 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 49 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 6 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 38 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HL's Valuation (64) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as BFH (86) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to BFH’s over the last 12 months.
HL's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as BFH (68) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to BFH’s over the last 12 months.
BFH's SMR Rating (6) in the Data Processing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for HL (88) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that BFH’s stock grew significantly faster than HL’s over the last 12 months.
HL's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as BFH (59) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to BFH’s over the last 12 months.
BFH's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HL (38) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that BFH’s stock grew somewhat faster than HL’s over the last 12 months.
| BFH | HL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 78% | 22 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 76% |
BFH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFH has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BFH jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BFH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFH | 100% | +2.17% | ||
| SYF - BFH | 83% Closely correlated | +4.03% | ||
| ENVA - BFH | 75% Closely correlated | +3.91% | ||
| OMF - BFH | 71% Closely correlated | +4.48% | ||
| ALLY - BFH | 69% Closely correlated | +3.52% | ||
| SLM - BFH | 67% Closely correlated | +3.65% | ||
More | ||||