BFLBY
Price
$22.88
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
4.18B
48 days until earnings call
CCOHF
Price
$0.88
Change
-$0.42 (-32.31%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
6.63B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BFLBY vs CCOHF

Header iconBFLBY vs CCOHF Comparison
Open Charts BFLBY vs CCOHFBanner chart's image
Bilfinger SE
Price$22.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization4.18B
China State Construction International Holdings
Price$0.88
Change-$0.42 (-32.31%)
Volume$29.6K
Capitalization6.63B
BFLBY vs CCOHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BFLBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CCOHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFLBY vs. CCOHF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFLBY is a Buy and CCOHF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BFLBY: $22.88 vs. CCOHF: $0.88)
Brand notoriety: BFLBY and CCOHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFLBY: 399% vs. CCOHF: 250%
Market capitalization -- BFLBY: $4.18B vs. CCOHF: $6.63B
BFLBY [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $4.18B. CCOHF’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $6.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFLBY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCCOHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BFLBY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CCOHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BFLBY is a better buy in the long-term than CCOHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFLBY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CCOHF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFLBY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CCOHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BFLBY is a better buy in the short-term than CCOHF.

Price Growth

BFLBY (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +2.14% price change this week, while CCOHF (@Engineering & Construction) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +0.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +335.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFLBY is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+0.94% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCOHF($6.63B) has a higher market cap than BFLBY($4.18B). BFLBY has higher P/E ratio than CCOHF: BFLBY (19.64) vs CCOHF (3.52). BFLBY YTD gains are higher at: 150.761 vs. CCOHF (-41.553).
BFLBYCCOHFBFLBY / CCOHF
Capitalization4.18B6.63B63%
EBITDA436MN/A-
Gain YTD150.761-41.553-363%
P/E Ratio19.643.52557%
Revenue5.27BN/A-
Total Cash430MN/A-
Total Debt369MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFLBY vs CCOHF: Fundamental Ratings
BFLBY
CCOHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9629
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
187
SMR RATING
1..100
5463
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3895
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCOHF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFLBY (49). This means that CCOHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFLBY’s over the last 12 months.

BFLBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CCOHF (87). This means that BFLBY’s stock grew significantly faster than CCOHF’s over the last 12 months.

BFLBY's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as CCOHF (63). This means that BFLBY’s stock grew similarly to CCOHF’s over the last 12 months.

BFLBY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCOHF (95). This means that BFLBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCOHF’s over the last 12 months.

BFLBY's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CCOHF (100). This means that BFLBY’s stock grew significantly faster than CCOHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFLBYCCOHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
62%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
24%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BFLBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CCOHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BSR29.80N/A
N/A
Beacon Selective Risk ETF
UXAP37.72N/A
N/A
FT Vest U.S. Eq Uncppd Acceler ETF - Apr
XMPT21.80-0.02
-0.09%
VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF
SHYL45.32-0.12
-0.26%
Xtrackers Short Duration High Yld Bd ETF
CHI10.69-0.13
-1.20%
Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund

BFLBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BFLBY and CCOHF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BFLBY and CCOHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFLBY
1D Price
Change %
BFLBY100%
N/A
CCOHF - BFLBY
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCKIF - BFLBY
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
BOUYY - BFLBY
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
BOUYF - BFLBY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BIRDF - BFLBY
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.31%
More

CCOHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCOHF and BBCP have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCOHF and BBCP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCOHF
1D Price
Change %
CCOHF100%
N/A
BBCP - CCOHF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
BFLBY - CCOHF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOUYY - CCOHF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
BOUYF - CCOHF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BIRDF - CCOHF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.31%
More