BFS
Price
$36.43
Change
+$0.40 (+1.11%)
Updated
Apr 30, 1:14 PM EST
2 days until earnings call
CXW
Price
$14.97
Change
-$0.12 (-0.79%)
Updated
Apr 30, 2:06 PM EST
8 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

Analysis and predictions BFS vs CXW

Header iconBFS vs CXW Comparison
Open Charts BFS vs CXWBanner chart's image
Saul Centers
Price$36.43
Change+$0.40 (+1.11%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
CoreCivic
Price$14.97
Change-$0.12 (-0.79%)
Volume$690
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BFS vs CXW Comparison Chart

Loading...

BFSDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
CXWDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
BFS vs. CXW commentary
Apr 30, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFS is a StrongSell and CXW is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 30, 2024
Stock price -- (BFS: $36.07 vs. CXW: $15.10)
Brand notoriety: BFS and CXW are both not notable
BFS represents the Real Estate Investment Trusts, while CXW is part of the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFS: 56% vs. CXW: 74%
Market capitalization -- BFS: $911.54M vs. CXW: $1.75B
BFS [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $911.54M. CXW’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $1.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.26B. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $4.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCXW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CXW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CXW is a better buy in the long-term than BFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CXW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CXW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BFS and CXW are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BFS (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -0.08% price change this week, while CXW (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was +1.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.47%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFS is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2024.

CXW is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-0.56% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+0.60% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for BFS with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for CXW with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXW($1.75B) has a higher market cap than BFS($912M). CXW has higher P/E ratio than BFS: CXW (26.34) vs BFS (21.97). CXW YTD gains are higher at: 3.923 vs. BFS (-5.266). CXW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 296M vs. BFS (165M). CXW has more cash in the bank: 122M vs. BFS (8.41M). CXW has less debt than BFS: CXW (1.21B) vs BFS (1.39B). CXW has higher revenues than BFS: CXW (1.9B) vs BFS (257M).
BFSCXWBFS / CXW
Capitalization912M1.75B52%
EBITDA165M296M56%
Gain YTD-5.2663.923-134%
P/E Ratio21.9726.3483%
Revenue257M1.9B14%
Total Cash8.41M122M7%
Total Debt1.39B1.21B115%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFS vs CXW: Fundamental Ratings
BFS
CXW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6161
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
4485
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5744
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
606
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BFS's Valuation (68) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CXW (99). This means that BFS’s stock grew similarly to CXW’s over the last 12 months.

BFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CXW (100). This means that BFS’s stock grew similarly to CXW’s over the last 12 months.

BFS's SMR Rating (44) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CXW (85). This means that BFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CXW’s over the last 12 months.

CXW's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as BFS (57). This means that CXW’s stock grew similarly to BFS’s over the last 12 months.

CXW's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFS (60). This means that CXW’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFSCXW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BFSDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
CXWDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NGJIX17.220.17
+1.00%
Nuveen Global Real Estate Securities I
SACEX12.010.07
+0.59%
Spirit of America Energy C
SVIIX11.070.06
+0.54%
Virtus Ceredex Large-Cap Value Equity A
CIVGX16.740.03
+0.18%
American Funds International Vntg 529-F2
AGVEX22.290.03
+0.13%
American Funds Global Insight F-1

BFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFS has been closely correlated with AKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BFS jumps, then AKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFS
1D Price
Change %
BFS100%
+1.52%
AKR - BFS
69%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
UE - BFS
69%
Closely correlated
+0.97%
OLP - BFS
69%
Closely correlated
+0.92%
FRT - BFS
66%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
ALEX - BFS
66%
Closely correlated
+1.73%
More

CXW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXW has been closely correlated with GEO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CXW jumps, then GEO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXW
1D Price
Change %
CXW100%
+0.27%
GEO - CXW
78%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
ALEX - CXW
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
KIM - CXW
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
GOOD - CXW
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
BFS - CXW
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.52%
More