BFS
Price
$37.80
Change
-$0.02 (-0.05%)
Updated
Jun 11, 11:52 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
927.94M
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FRT
Price
$124.85
Change
+$1.23 (+0.99%)
Updated
Jun 11, 01:18 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.68B
55 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BFS vs FRT

Header iconBFS vs FRT Comparison
Open Charts BFS vs FRTBanner chart's image
BFS vs FRT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFS vs. FRT commentary
Jun 11, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFS is a StrongBuy and FRT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 11, 2026
Stock price -- (BFS: $37.82 vs. FRT: $123.62)
Brand notoriety: BFS and FRT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFS: 176% vs. FRT: 116%
Market capitalization -- BFS: $927.94M vs. FRT: $10.68B
BFS [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $927.94M. FRT’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $10.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $9.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFRT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FRT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BFS is a better buy in the long-term than FRT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FRT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRT is a better buy in the short-term than BFS.

Price Growth

BFS (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +7.14% price change this week, while FRT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +3.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +4.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFS is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

FRT is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+4.43% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRT($10.7B) has a higher market cap than BFS($928M). BFS has higher P/E ratio than FRT: BFS (35.68) vs FRT (21.42). FRT (25.363) and BFS (24.318) have similar YTD gains . FRT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.09B vs. BFS (179M). FRT has more cash in the bank: 116M vs. BFS (9.33M). BFS has less debt than FRT: BFS (1.6B) vs FRT (4.93B). FRT has higher revenues than BFS: FRT (1.31B) vs BFS (296M).
BFSFRTBFS / FRT
Capitalization928M10.7B9%
EBITDA179M1.09B16%
Gain YTD24.31825.36396%
P/E Ratio35.6821.42167%
Revenue296M1.31B23%
Total Cash9.33M116M8%
Total Debt1.6B4.93B32%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFS vs FRT: Fundamental Ratings
BFS
FRT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2116
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7354
SMR RATING
1..100
4654
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4416
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1875
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BFS's Valuation (28) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (60). This means that BFS’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as BFS (73). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to BFS’s over the last 12 months.

BFS's SMR Rating (46) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (54). This means that BFS’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's Price Growth Rating (16) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as BFS (44). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to BFS’s over the last 12 months.

BFS's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRT (75). This means that BFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFSFRT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
49%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FRT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IVIAX23.38N/A
N/A
Nomura International Core Equity A
WWSCX23.10N/A
N/A
Keeley Small Cap Fund C
FEFRX33.49N/A
N/A
First Eagle Rising Dividend Fund R6
AMFFX61.98-0.55
-0.88%
American Funds American Mutual F1
JDIRX62.34-1.29
-2.03%
Janus Henderson Overseas R

BFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFS has been closely correlated with LXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BFS jumps, then LXP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFS
1D Price
Change %
BFS100%
+1.04%
LXP - BFS
69%
Closely correlated
+0.30%
NXRT - BFS
68%
Closely correlated
-1.72%
STAG - BFS
67%
Closely correlated
-0.05%
UDR - BFS
66%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
IRT - BFS
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
More