Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFSIX vs RWMFX
BFSIX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts BFSIX vs RWMFX
BFS Equity Institutional
Price$26.74
Change+$0.15 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.78M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.25
Change+$0.23 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.68B
BFSIX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFSIX vs. RWMFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFSIX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. BFSIX (61.8M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than BFSIX: RWMFX (1.41) vs BFSIX (0.43). BFSIX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: BFSIX (12 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). BFSIX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. BFSIX (16.10). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BFSIX: RWMFX (250) vs BFSIX (1000). RWMFX (4.59) and BFSIX (4.57) have marching annual gain over last year. RWMFX (45.02) and BFSIX (43.50) have equivalent 5 years return.
| BFSIX | RWMFX | BFSIX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.31 | 319% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.31 | 377% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.088 | 8.905 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 61.8M | 204B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 1.41 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.57 | 4.59 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.41 | 29.92 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.50 | 45.02 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.66 | 72.75 | 180% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement