Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFSIX vs RWMFX
BFSIX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts BFSIX vs RWMFX
BFSIX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFSIX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFSIX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. BFSIX (60.9M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than BFSIX: RWMFX (1.41) vs BFSIX (0.16). BFSIX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: BFSIX (13 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). BFSIX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. BFSIX (26.67). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BFSIX: RWMFX (250) vs BFSIX (1000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.33 vs. BFSIX (-1.59). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.42 vs. BFSIX (21.19).
| BFSIX | RWMFX | BFSIX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.31 | 319% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.31 | 377% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.844 | 3.404 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 60.9M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 1.41 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.59 | 1.33 | -120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.40 | 29.00 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.19 | 26.42 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.33 | 80.74 | 173% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers