BFST
Price
$31.15
Change
-$0.07 (-0.22%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.01B
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OCFC
Price
$19.06
Change
-$0.02 (-0.10%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.84B
66 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BFST vs OCFC

BFST vs OCFC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFST vs. OCFC commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFST is a Hold and OCFC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (BFST: $31.15 vs. OCFC: $19.06)
Brand notoriety: BFST and OCFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFST: 119% vs. OCFC: 63%
Market capitalization -- BFST: $1.01B vs. OCFC: $1.84B
BFST [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.01B. OCFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFST’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOCFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BFST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OCFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BFST is a better buy in the long-term than OCFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFST’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OCFC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OCFC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BFST is a better buy in the short-term than OCFC.

Price Growth

BFST (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.02% price change this week, while OCFC (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFST is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

OCFC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.32% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OCFC($1.84B) has a higher market cap than BFST($1.01B). OCFC has higher P/E ratio than BFST: OCFC (23.54) vs BFST (11.09). BFST YTD gains are higher at: 21.014 vs. OCFC (9.594). BFST has less debt than OCFC: BFST (363M) vs OCFC (1.44B). OCFC has higher revenues than BFST: OCFC (438M) vs BFST (344M).
BFSTOCFCBFST / OCFC
Capitalization1.01B1.84B55%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD21.0149.594219%
P/E Ratio11.0923.5447%
Revenue344M438M79%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt363M1.44B25%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFST vs OCFC: Fundamental Ratings
BFST
OCFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5779
SMR RATING
1..100
4961
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4653
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
329
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OCFC's Valuation (18) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BFST (39) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that OCFC’s stock grew similarly to BFST’s over the last 12 months.

BFST's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as OCFC (79) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BFST’s stock grew similarly to OCFC’s over the last 12 months.

BFST's SMR Rating (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as OCFC (61) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BFST’s stock grew similarly to OCFC’s over the last 12 months.

BFST's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as OCFC (53) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BFST’s stock grew similarly to OCFC’s over the last 12 months.

OCFC's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BFST (32) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that OCFC’s stock grew similarly to BFST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFSTOCFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BFST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OCFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EQTY29.870.24
+0.81%
Kovitz Core Equity ETF
GAL53.810.15
+0.27%
State Street® Global Allocation ETF
CBOA24.26N/A
N/A
Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - April
TIPZ51.13-0.21
-0.41%
PIMCO Broad US TIPS ETF
EDZ14.66-0.27
-1.81%
Direxion Daily MSCI Em Mkts Bear 3X ETF

BFST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFST has been closely correlated with BY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BFST jumps, then BY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFST
1D Price
Change %
BFST100%
-0.22%
BY - BFST
86%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
UVSP - BFST
84%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
SRCE - BFST
84%
Closely correlated
-0.37%
CAC - BFST
83%
Closely correlated
+0.30%
IBCP - BFST
82%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
More