Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFTHX vs GFAFX
BFTHX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts BFTHX vs GFAFX
Baron Fifth Avenue Growth Retail
Price$65.45
Change+$0.17 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets762.73M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.98
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
BFTHX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFTHX vs. GFAFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFTHX is a Hold and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. BFTHX (763M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than BFTHX: GFAFX (0.29) vs BFTHX (0.00). BFTHX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: BFTHX (21 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). BFTHX (1.03) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). BFTHX (26.00) and GFAFX (25.00) have comparable annual turnover. GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BFTHX: GFAFX (250) vs BFTHX (2000). BFTHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.50 vs. GFAFX (11.53). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. BFTHX (33.72).
| BFTHX | GFAFX | BFTHX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.67 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.67 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.450 | 17.923 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 763M | 337B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.29 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.50 | 11.53 | 204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 128.62 | 72.21 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.72 | 40.02 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 264.65 | 100.61 | 263% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers