Ad is loading...
BFTHX vs GFAFX
BFTHX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts BFTHX vs GFAFX
Baron Fifth Avenue Growth Retail
Price$47.85
Change+$0.65 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets610.21M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$66.54
Change+$1.04 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
BFTHX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFTHX vs. GFAFX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFTHX is a Buy and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. BFTHX (610M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than BFTHX: GFAFX (0.35) vs BFTHX (0.00). BFTHX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: BFTHX (21 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). BFTHX (1.03) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BFTHX (13.38). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BFTHX: GFAFX (250) vs BFTHX (2000). BFTHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.19 vs. GFAFX (-5.32). BFTHX (48.80) and GFAFX (47.17) have equivalent 5 years return.
| BFTHX | GFAFX | BFTHX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.67 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.67 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -17.468 | -9.789 | 178% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 610M | 261B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.35 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.19 | -5.32 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.18 | 6.81 | 311% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.80 | 47.17 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.49 | 50.37 | 305% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...